Sharechat Logo

Noel Leeming fined $200,000 for misleading consumers

Friday 14th December 2018

Text too small?

Noel Leeming has been fined $200,000 for misleading consumers about their rights under the Consumer Guarantees Act following a Commerce Commission prosecution.

The homeware retailer, which is owned by The Warehouse Group, was convicted on eight charges under the Fair Trading Act with each charge relating to a different complainant.

The eight cases of Noel Leeming providing false or misleading misrepresentations about their rights occurred between September 2015 and January 2017 at seven different Noel Leeming stores across New Zealand – Noel Leeming has 77 stores nationwide.

The complainants purchased consumer goods such as mobile phones, laptops and household appliances.

Noel Leeming pleaded guilty in the Auckland District Court today and was fined by Judge Nicola Mathers.

“The prosecution related to multiple consumers in multiple locations. It was not isolated or one off conduct,” says commissioner Anna Rawlings.

“Consumers complained to Noel Leeming about products and were entitled to have their complaints treated seriously, investigated properly and remedied where appropriate,” she said. 

“Instead, they were misled – sometimes repeatedly – about their rights under the law at a moment when it really mattered to consumers that their legal rights were honoured.”

Consumers were misled about their right to seek remedies for faulty goods from Noel Leeming, rather than the manufacturer, about their right to a refund for a faulty product, and about their right to a replacement for a faulty product.

Judge Mathers said there were “direct and significant departures from the truth" in every case.

"Consumers were denied their rights and had real difficulty dealing with Noel Leeming.”

Noel Leeming’s misrepresentations included telling a customer that claims under the Consumer Guarantees Act about an iPhone had to be negotiated directly with Apple, that the Act “is not effective” for Noel Leeming and that a consumer wasn’t entitled to a refund despite false representations made about the suitability of a mobile phone and that a customer had to contact Microsoft about a faulty product.

Other misrepresentations were that Noel Leeming could repair a fridge as many times as it liked and the customer was also told he could only get a store credit to purchase another fridge. Another customer was told mobile phones were only replaced within 14 days and that a new phone could only be obtained if a fault occurred three times.

All of these statements are simply wrong, Rawlings said.

Under the Act, it is the retailer who has to deal with complaints about faulty products and to either repair or replace the product or provide a refund.

Since 2007 the commission has warned Noel Leeming, or issued it with compliance advice, about potentially misleading of consumers about their rights.

(BusinessDesk)



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Spark New Zealand appoints new director to the Spark Board
AFT to announce full year results on May 23 2024
CRP - Korella North Takes Another Two Steps Forward
May 3rd Morning Report
ASB workers to strike as bank proposes an effective pay cut
Rising tides, sinking stocks: study explores cost of climate change
May 2nd Morning Report
AGL - Change in Senior Management
Devon Funds Morning Note - 01 May 2024
Rick Christie to step-aside as a non-executive director