Retiring managing director Dr Francis Small said a belief among key staff that it had a contribution to make to the economy saved rail. Other reasons were:
- Acceptance by key stakeholders - politicians, management, staff, unions, customers - that dramatic action had to be taken to fundamentally change a shambolic system if it was to survive.
- A road to Damascus conversion for then railways minister Richard Prebble some time during his 1985-86 "Save Rail" campaign. "Somewhere along the way ... 'Prebs' [found that] delightful phrase 'I'm going to save rail - but not for all of you.'"
- Some "pretty brave actions" by groups of senior staff and managers who took key steps, realising they meant there would be no future for them in the reshaped company.
- Prompt actions that made fundamental changes without upsetting the customers too much - from changed timetables to reworked management information systems and even to reducing goods yards and workshops.
- Communications programme which at each step had Little Red Books supplied to staff, detailing the change. "Those involved had a belief the business would survive and would make an important contribution to New Zealand industry."
- Ray Lilley
Comments from our readers
No comments yet
Add your comment:
Related News:
SPG - FY26 Annual Results
PYS - PaySauce FY26 Full Year Result and Annual Report
IFT - Infratil Full Year Results for the year ended 31 March 2026
May 27th Morning Report
RYM - FY26 marks significant year of progress
FPH reports strong revenue and profit growth for FY26
IFT - Infratil Full Year Results for the year ended 31 March 2026
PEB - Advancing Medicare Coverage Goals; Cost Contained
TRU - TruScreen Completes Oversubscribed Placement
EROAD Continues Transformation, Reports FY26 Results