Retiring managing director Dr Francis Small said a belief among key staff that it had a contribution to make to the economy saved rail. Other reasons were:
- Acceptance by key stakeholders - politicians, management, staff, unions, customers - that dramatic action had to be taken to fundamentally change a shambolic system if it was to survive.
- A road to Damascus conversion for then railways minister Richard Prebble some time during his 1985-86 "Save Rail" campaign. "Somewhere along the way ... 'Prebs' [found that] delightful phrase 'I'm going to save rail - but not for all of you.'"
- Some "pretty brave actions" by groups of senior staff and managers who took key steps, realising they meant there would be no future for them in the reshaped company.
- Prompt actions that made fundamental changes without upsetting the customers too much - from changed timetables to reworked management information systems and even to reducing goods yards and workshops.
- Communications programme which at each step had Little Red Books supplied to staff, detailing the change. "Those involved had a belief the business would survive and would make an important contribution to New Zealand industry."
- Ray Lilley
Comments from our readers
No comments yet
Add your comment:
Related News:
PFI - Q3 Div & Upgraded FY25 Div Guidance, FY26 Div Guidance
AIA - Auckland Airport announces leadership team change
May 9th Morning Report
May 8th Morning Report
NZME Takeovers Panel determination
MNW - Commerce Commission clears the Contact Energy acquisition
May 7th Morning Report
General Capital Appoints New CFO
SUM - Summerset Considers Retail Bond Offer
SKC - Updated FY25 Full Year Earnings Guidance