Sharechat Logo

Takeovers code won't stop raider premiums

By Mike Ross

Friday 10th November 2000

Text too small?
The new takeovers code will not prevent raiders paying a premium for control when grabbing an opening foothold, a leading law firm says.

One major criticism of the takeovers code has been the potential loss of a premium otherwise enjoyed by shareholders sitting on a strategic stake.

A takeover rule requiring offers to be held open for all comers means no premium is paid for control.

Chapman Tripp lawyer Roger Wallis points out that the rule does not kick in until the bidder already holds a 20% stake in the target company.

This means raiders can pay a premium when buying an opening stake, up to the 20% threshold.

Writing in Counsel, the Chapman Tripp client newsletter, Mr Wallis says the New Zealand takeover code does not have a "relation back" rule, unlike Australia.

In Australia, takeover bids cannot be made at a price per share less than that offered in the previous four months.

This discourages bidders from paying a premium when building up an initial stake below the Australian 20% threshold.

In New Zealand, bidders are most restricted when controlling 20-50% of a target company.

Offers to buy must be held open for all existing shareholders, with scaling if there are excess acceptances.

Once over 50%, a "creep rule" also operates, allowing bidders to increase their holding up to 5% over a 12-month period without having to offer similar prices to all other shareholders.

This is tougher than most overseas codes, according to Mr Wallis. Elsewhere, a creep rule allows small purchases both under and over the 50% threshold.

Chapman Tripp is warning capital markets that there are no smooth transition rules to govern takeovers spanning the June 30, 2001 start date for the takeovers code.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Deposit protection reduces case for RBNZ's bank capital increases, Robertson hints
NZ dollar higher after Lowe comments viewed as less dovish
Govt to introduce deposit insurance; RBNZ keeps prudential supervision
Granular approach needed for cost-effective emissions reduction
Bank executive incentives a key focus for regulators
Appeal Court puts ANZ back in the gun over interest rate swaps
Meridian to supply Australian online retailer Kogan.com
RBNZ seen keeping rates on hold but signalling more cuts to come
RBNZ demands assurance ANZ New Zealand is operating prudently
Citic gets seat at Tourism Holdings in $80 mln capital raising

IRG See IRG research reports