Sharechat Logo

Commerce Commission loses bid to extend fees claim against Bluestone Mortgages

Monday 20th August 2012

Text too small?

The Commerce Commission has lost a bid to widen its claim against Australian lender Bluestone Mortgages NZ over fees charged on early repayments.

Judge Patricia Courtney turned down the competition regulator's application to extend the timeframe of its claim in the High Court on Auckland earlier this month, saying she had to strike a balance between the rights of borrowers and lenders.

The judgment was published on the Justice Minister's website last week. The regulator alleges Bluestone breached the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act by charging unreasonable early repayment fees on loans that were typically granted for a 30-year term but usually repaid within the first four years.

The commission is seeking a refund for a number of those fees. Judge Courtney didn'taccept the commission's argument that the limitation period shouldn't begin until the fee is actually charged rather than from when the loan agreement is made.

She also disagreed with the regulator's contention that its claim was always representative, and that the amended claim was "no more than a particularisation of the existing claim and is not time barred."

Rather, she said each loan pleaded by the regulator represents a new cause of action with each fee charged specific to the terms of the individual loan.

"Although my finding may prevent some borrowers from claiming relief, I nevertheless consider that it would not be reasonable or fair if a borrower could circumvent the CCCF Act's limitation provisions simply by joining a representative claim," the judgment said.

The antitrust regulator was attempting to extend the timeframe of its initial claim between April 2005 and October 2006 by a further five years.

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

June 2nd Morning Report
IKE - FY26 Financial Results
Chorus submits 2025 fibre regulatory report
SPG - FY26 Annual Results
PYS - PaySauce FY26 Full Year Result and Annual Report
IFT - Infratil Full Year Results for the year ended 31 March 2026
May 27th Morning Report
RYM - FY26 marks significant year of progress
FPH reports strong revenue and profit growth for FY26
IFT - Infratil Full Year Results for the year ended 31 March 2026