By Mike Ross
Friday 28th July 2000 |
Text too small? |
Long a critic of any takeover code requiring mandatory offers at the same price to all shareholders, the Business Roundtable sees public agitation for an equal price rule as clearly driven by envy and greed.
It points out there are serious economic consequences for an equal price rule. Incompetent management and weak boards are sheltered from hostile takeovers.
Takeover activity will be discouraged, to the detriment of all shareholders.
Frustrated by a lack of any sound public policy rationale for the latest draft takeovers code, the Business Roundtable has criticised the political response to those lobbyists who are calling for an equal price rule.
The roundtable argues investors should be allowed to set their own rules, as they presently do, by choosing one of the three standard takeover options required for companies listed with the Stock Exchange.
At the very least, it says, companies should be allowed to opt out of a takeovers code by shareholder vote, either before or after listing.
The Business Roundtable dismisses as absurd the argument that a one-size-fits-all code will lift share prices.
It criticises the Takeovers Panel for its unwillingness to engage in principled analysis and debate and its refusal to have regard to evidence of economic harm following a mandatory-bid equal-price rule.
No comments yet
IKE 1Q FY26 Performance Update
July 29th Morning Report
General Capital Annual Shareholders Meeting Results
MEE - Receivers and Liquidators appointed to King Honey
2 Cheap Cars Group Updates Performance Outlook for FY26
Spark announces Director changes as part of Board renewal
July 28th Morning Report
KMD Brands announces new Group Chief Financial Officer
Commerce Commission to issue SOI re Viridian application
FBU - Moody's affirms FBU Baa3/stable rating