By Mike Ross
Friday 28th July 2000 |
Text too small? |
Long a critic of any takeover code requiring mandatory offers at the same price to all shareholders, the Business Roundtable sees public agitation for an equal price rule as clearly driven by envy and greed.
It points out there are serious economic consequences for an equal price rule. Incompetent management and weak boards are sheltered from hostile takeovers.
Takeover activity will be discouraged, to the detriment of all shareholders.
Frustrated by a lack of any sound public policy rationale for the latest draft takeovers code, the Business Roundtable has criticised the political response to those lobbyists who are calling for an equal price rule.
The roundtable argues investors should be allowed to set their own rules, as they presently do, by choosing one of the three standard takeover options required for companies listed with the Stock Exchange.
At the very least, it says, companies should be allowed to opt out of a takeovers code by shareholder vote, either before or after listing.
The Business Roundtable dismisses as absurd the argument that a one-size-fits-all code will lift share prices.
It criticises the Takeovers Panel for its unwillingness to engage in principled analysis and debate and its refusal to have regard to evidence of economic harm following a mandatory-bid equal-price rule.
No comments yet
CDC Independent Valuation - 30 June 2025
TruScreen Group Limited SPP Update
THL provides updated guidance
CEN - Greymouth gas deal
July 4th Morning Report
July 3rd Morning Report
ikeGPS Chief Financial Officer Transition
TWL - TradeWindow announces strategic partnership with FTA
BLT - Patent issue settled and new 5 year agreement with BSP
July 2nd Morning Report