|
Monday 11th July 2005 |
Text too small? |
The first complaint was made by the committee of independent directors of Oyster Bay Marlborough Vineyards and it related to a possible sale of Oyster Bay shares by Peter Yealands Investments (PYIL) after its partial takeover offer for Oyster Bay has closed, but before the transfer of shares was completed (if the offer is successful).
The independent directors complained that the possible sale, which has been under consideration by PYIL, would breach rule 35 of the Code. Rule 35 prevents an offeror selling target company shares during the offer period.
The independent directors complained that, in addition, the sale by PYIL would breach the terms of PYIL's takeover offer document.
The panel received submissions from both parties in response to the complaint. The panel considered the information and decided, based on the submissions, to take no further action in respect of the complaint by the independent directors.
A complaint from Delegat's Wine Estate against PYIL was also considered by the panel today. Delegat's is also making a partial takeover bid for Oyster Bay.
This complaint alleged that a statement in a variation notice posted on the NZX website by PYIL on 7 July 2005 (raising the price offered for Oyster Bay shares), was misleading and breached the Code. The statement was about the chances of Oyster Bay shareholders selling all their shareholdings under the two partial offers.
The panel considered the information and decided to take no further action in respect of the complaint by Delegat's.
No comments yet
March 18th Morning Report
MCY - Mercury opens $220m geothermal expansion
PYS - PaySauce undertakes Minimum Holding buyback
March 17th Morning Report
Meridian Energy monthly operating report for February 2026
MCY - Mercury considers Green Bond offer
March 16th Morning Report
Metro Performance Glass FY26 Market Update
Devon Funds Morning Note - 13 March 2026
Devon Funds Morning Note - 12 March 2026