Sharechat Logo

Pilots' Association to appeal Wellington runway ruling

Thursday 14th July 2016

Text too small?

The New Zealand Airline Pilots' Association is to appeal the High Court's decision to turn down a judicial review of the 90-metre safety area proposed in the Wellington Airport runway extension, which the association regards as too short. 

Last week Justice Karen Clark rejected an application for judicial review of the Civil Aviation director's decision by the New Zealand Airline Pilots' Association saying the director didn't make an error in law in reaching the conclusion, nor was the consultation process with the NZAPA inadequate. 

She rejected the NZAPA's claim that a cost-benefit analysis relied on by the director subordinated safety to cost, calling such criticism "unfounded". The threshold needed to establish an error of law based on "flawed evidence simply has not be met evidentially by the applicant," the judgment said.

The pilots' association president Tim Robinson said their appeal was based on international aviation safety requirements which require an area of 240-metres, or an equivalent consisting of a mechanical system known as EMAS. “The proposed 90 metres falls well short of international standards. Add to this Wellington airport’s challenging environment, and it becomes clear why pilots are so concerned.”

The association is to file its appeal by the end of the end of the month. 

Wellington Airport wants to build a 350-metre runway extension in an effort to attract long-haul flights from Asia and the US, for an estimated $300 million. Majority shareholder Infratil has been pushing for central and local government to cover the cost, claiming the national and regional interest would benefit from the investment which wasn't viable on a standalone commercial basis.

 

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Devon Funds Morning Note - 1 September 2025
September 1st Morning Report
POT Financial Results for the year to 30 June 2025
MOVE FY25 Results for the year ended 30 June 2025
BPG - Completion of Retail Offer
Comvita releases results for the year ended 30 June 2025
August 29th Morning Report
Air New Zealand announces 2025 financial result
August 28th Morning Report
VSL - 2025 date of Annual Meeting of shareholders