About Us  |   Advertise  |   Contact Us  |   Terms & Conditions  |   RSS Feeds
 
Support our sponsors:
sharemarket

Forum Archive Index - February 2004

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] TLS


From: "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:47:13 +1300


Hi winner69,
 
> 
>Back to Telstra. Your words "I think Telstra does have 
>a low downside risk.  
>That's because it is the dominant player in the 
>telecommunications industry in Australasia by far" 
>echoed in my thoughts when I saw this dude on Business Sunday
>comparing Telstra today to BT (British Telecom) of a few years ago. 
>BT was in that same position a few years ago before competition
>undermined it soo much it needed a huge bailout. 
>

Competition was not the reason BT needed a huge cash issue.  The 
reason for that was that BT paid far too much for 3G mobile phone 
licences both in Britain and Germany.   What is more, the licence 
carried an obligation for an enormous amount of capital expenditure to 
set up the network, so there was yet more major negative cash flow 
stretching years out into the future.   

The final bit of the resue plan was when BT was split into 'BT Group' 
and MmO2 (the multimedia phone network arm).    MmO2 is still a cash 
burner, even today.

>
>I think that dude
>today was trying to say that Telstra needs to change it ways and not
>rely on its traditional thinking ... maybe Ziggy been around too long.
> 

My impression is just the opposite.   Telstra has relied too much on 
'non-traditional thinking', which lead them to the PCCW purchase in 
the first place.  

I'll pass on whether Ziggy is past his use by date.

>
>Interesting view that somebody suggests that that could happen to
>Telstra  - but that downside risk such an event would take some time
>to eventuate. 
>

Telstra has about the same popular public profile in Australia, as 
Telecom NZ has in NZ.    But I don't see that the fact of Telecom being 
the major player in NZ, will lead to their early demise as market leader.  
Quite the contrary in fact.


>
>As such any theory (alright hope or wishful thinking)
>that the TLS shareprice will rise from 467 (yes that is the answer
>answer to the ultimate question) to 542 odd is not affected.
> 
>Go Telstra over the next few weeks
> 

...and the next few years :-)

SNOOPY

discl: hold TLS




--
Message sent by Snoopy 
on Pegasus Mail version 4.02
----------------------------------
"You can tell me I'm wrong twice, 
but that still only makes me wrong once."


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/


References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] My troubled portfolio...... ryanrite
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] My troubled portfolio...... SJ.Greaves ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] KCN reply.... Russell
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] TLS winner69 . ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]

 
News Alerts
Breaking News 
After the Bell (daily) 
Gold News 

Unsubscribe/Update »

RSS feeds »
Twitter »
Facebook »

Bond
Bond
Most Commented On
   





© Copyright 2014 MoneyOnline Ltd & Investment Research Group Ltd. All Rights Reserved.