Sharechat Logo

DuluxGroup settles Alesco tax case on eve of Supreme Court hearing

Monday 17th February 2014

Text too small?

DuluxGroup, the ASX-listed paint manufacturer, has settled a tax dispute with New Zealand's Inland Revenue Department over subsidiary Alesco NZ's use of optional convertible notes.

The terms of the settlement are confidential, though DuluxGroup expects it will be less than the $12.7 million provision in its accounts as at Sept. 30 last year, it said in a statement. The settlement comes before a three-day hearing was due to kick off tomorrow in New Zealand's highest court.

Last year, the Supreme Court granted Alesco leave to appeal a March decision in the Court of Appeal which would see Alesco face an $8.6 million bill in back taxes and penalties.

The company used instruments known as optional convertible notes to fund the acquisitions because tax deductions on the New Zealand side of the Tasman weren't countered by an offsetting tax derived from income in Australia. The Inland Revenue Department contended the hybrid securities, which let companies juggle equity and debt to provide a tax advantage, were structured purely to minimise tax.

The thrust of Alesco's appeal of a High Court judgment was that the Commissioner for Inland Revenue had originally okayed the use of the instruments, and that there was real commercial purpose in the transactions to buy two New Zealand businesses.

The Alesco decision has wider implications, with a raft of other companies facing similar proceedings, with some $300 million in tax and penalties at stake.

Among other Australasian corporates caught up are Qantas, Transfield, Telstra Corp, Toll Holdings, and Ironbridge, the former owners of Mediaworks, which runs the TV3 and RadioLive networks.

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

NZ dollar bounces off four-year low; seen weaker
Vector urges regulatory change in low-interest-rate environment
Vector urges regulatory change in low-interest-rate environment
Govt moves against surprise Supreme Court 'black hole' tax ruling
Qantas CFO Race Strauss to join A2 Milk as CFO
Climate Committee seeks data, evidence for future carbon budgets
Spark's wobbly world cup start raises stakes for live-streaming - analysts
An algorithm dunnit: anatomy of Spark's mid-match surrender
Stanley-Tallwood liquidator cuts deal over KiwiBuild development
Stanley-Tallwood liquidator cuts deal over KiwiBuild development

IRG See IRG research reports