By Chris Hutching
Friday 1st August 2003 |
Text too small? |
Richmond and PPCS are two of the country's big-four meat companies so the outcome of the court case will determine the future structure of the meat industry although both parties are likely to appeal to the Privy Council regardless of the Appeal Court outcome.
Robert Dobson QC, acting for the minority Richmond shareholders, told the five judges they should order the forfeiture and divestment of all the shares PPCS owns because the company would be seen as having got away with serious and repeated breaches of the Securities Act.
The earlier High Court case upheld the Richmond assertion that PPCS used nominees and misled shareholders about its holdings in various substantial security holder notices.
Mr Dobson accused PPCS of a "pattern of concerted deceit" on several occasions including when it had been ordered to sell a portion of Richmond shares acquired in contravention of the Richmond constitution. PPCS later bought back those shares.
Alan Galbraith QC, acting for PPCS, said that the market had never been disadvantaged by PPCS actions. On the contrary there had never been a higher bid for the shares than the recent takeover offer from PPCS at $3.11.
Mr Galbraith said that ordering full forfeiture would be out of proportion to any offence. It would be like an 80% shareholder who acquired another 6% of shares in breach of notice and pause rules being ordered to sell the entire 86%.
No comments yet
BLT - Revenue growth with one off cost pressures impacting profit
FRW - Full Year Results to 30 June 2025 and Final Dividend
Devon Funds Morning Note - 18 August 2025
August 18th Morning Report
2025 Annual Shareholders' Meeting and Director Nominations
Meridian Energy monthly operating report for July 2025
August 15th Morning Report
VGL upgrades aspirations, accelerates to meet client demand
August 14th Morning Report
VHP - Focus on Fundamentals: Driving Operational Performance