By Chris Hutching
|
Friday 1st August 2003 |
Text too small? |
Richmond and PPCS are two of the country's big-four meat companies so the outcome of the court case will determine the future structure of the meat industry although both parties are likely to appeal to the Privy Council regardless of the Appeal Court outcome.
Robert Dobson QC, acting for the minority Richmond shareholders, told the five judges they should order the forfeiture and divestment of all the shares PPCS owns because the company would be seen as having got away with serious and repeated breaches of the Securities Act.
The earlier High Court case upheld the Richmond assertion that PPCS used nominees and misled shareholders about its holdings in various substantial security holder notices.
Mr Dobson accused PPCS of a "pattern of concerted deceit" on several occasions including when it had been ordered to sell a portion of Richmond shares acquired in contravention of the Richmond constitution. PPCS later bought back those shares.
Alan Galbraith QC, acting for PPCS, said that the market had never been disadvantaged by PPCS actions. On the contrary there had never been a higher bid for the shares than the recent takeover offer from PPCS at $3.11.
Mr Galbraith said that ordering full forfeiture would be out of proportion to any offence. It would be like an 80% shareholder who acquired another 6% of shares in breach of notice and pause rules being ordered to sell the entire 86%.
No comments yet
GEN - General Capital Subsidiary Credit Rating Update
Fonterra updates 2025/26 season Farmgate Milk Price
FRW - Acquisition of VT Freight Express
PaySauce Opens $1m Share Purchase Plan
December 17th Morning Report
RUA - Successful rights offer is oversubscribed
Steel & Tube - Shareholder Newsletter - December 2025
SKC - Resignation of Chief Risk Officer
December 16th Morning Report
Comvita reaches agreement with lending partners