Sharechat Logo

Zespri ordered by High Court to reconsider collaborative marketing proposals from Seeka and Splice

Friday 6th May 2016

Text too small?

The  High Court has told kiwifruit marketer Zespri to reconsider collaborative marketing proposals from Splice Fruit and Seeka Kiwifruit to sell fruit offshore that its board had previously rejected.

When Zespri was set up in 1999 the government made it the sole entity entitled to export kiwifruit to anywhere other than Australia but also allowed for collaborative marketing where third parties can seek approval from the board to export in association with Zespri.

Te Puke kiwifruit exporters and marketers Splice Fruit and Seeka Kiwifruit sought approval from the High Court at Tauranga for a judicial review of three board decisions last December rejecting collaborative marketing proposals in the 2016 export season. Splice wanted to export 400,000 trays of green Class I fruit to Austria while Seeka wanted to export 400,000 trays of green fruit to Hainan Island in China and 120,000 trays of green fruit to Xinjiang province in China.

A fast-tracked court hearing was held because the 2016 season is already underway.

The applicants claim the Zespri board acted unreasonably in rejecting their applications. The rationale for rejecting Splice’s proposal was that it wasn’t entirely consistent with Zespri’s marketing strategy of creating brand value and premium returns to New Zealand suppliers and didn’t meet the test of creating overall wealth.

In the two Seeka cases, it was considered there was the danger the fruit destined for Hainan Island could “leak” into mainland China and create “confusion and disruption” in a very large market which could depress prices while in the Xinjiang province Zespri said it was worried selling under the Seeka brand would lead to a “substitution risk for Zespri branded programmes”.

It had been industry practise for some years to allow parties to appeal decisions made by the relevant collaborative marketing committees to a board appeal committee. Seeka chief executive Michael Franks told the court the appeals process was important because members of the board committees making the decision on collaborative marketing “often have conflicts of interest” as they are direct competitors. “In the past, the appeals process afforded Seeka an opportunity for a cost efficient review by alternative members,” he said.

Zespri had legal advice from senior counsel in November that the board had no jurisdiction to hear appeals.

However Justice Paul Heath said in his written judgment that “it was open to the board to regulate its own procedure by incorporating a review process of that type, whether the label 'appeal' or 'review' is used is beside the point.”

Based on past experience, both kiwifruit exporters were entitled to believe a process of that type would be followed if applied for, he said, and a rehearing by the board or a nominated committee is necessary in all three cases.

Kiwifruit New Zealand’s 2014/15 annual report shows collaborative marketing volumes dropped during the season to 1.6 million trays out of 97 million trays exported. The report said on average 93 percent of collaborative marketing applications in the past decade had been approved although “disappointedly, none have evolved into high volume, significantly innovative and wealth-enhancing arrangements that meet the regulatory criteria”.

In February this year, Zespri signed a memorandum of understanding with T&G to grow exports, three years after the listed produce company abandoned its long-running legal fight against the kiwifruit marketer’s statutory export dominance.

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

SML - Synlait Milk Limited - Trading Halt of Securities
AIA - Auckland Airport announces board chair changes
AIA - Auckland Airport announces board chair changes
CEN - Tauhara commissioning progress update
FPH initiates voluntary limited recall
March 28th Morning Report
KFL Celebrates 20 Years of Excellence in Investment Mgmt.
SVR - Savor FY24 Earnings Guidance & Change in Banking Partner
NZK - NZ King Salmon Investments Limited FY24 Results
March 27th Morning Report