By Chris Hutching
|
Friday 14th July 2000 |
Text too small? |
The company has yet to take advice from its counsel, John Fogarty QC, about taking an appeal but Apple Fields directors are reluctant to let the matter drop because they feel some key legal issues were not addressed in the ruling by Justice John Hansen.
The key issue was whether financier Ken Smith acted properly in his role as mortgagee of the property and his involvement in the joint venture company with developer Robin Hughes who bought the land.
Justice Hansen concluded the complicated structure of the sale involving a series of contracts between several companies had benefited Apple Fields by $21 million because ANZ Bank wrote off $8 million of a debt it was owed.
He said Apple Fields wanted only part of the deal unwound, not the bit involving the write-off.
Justice Hansen said Apple Fields was being opportunistic in trying to take advantage of the unusual situation after the event.
He criticised Apple Fields founder Tom Kain for trying to take financial advantage of what occurred at the time by asking for more money for an adjacent block of land he owned. Mr Kain has refused to settle the sale.
No comments yet
CDC investor presentation and guidance update
PFI - Potential Bond Offer by PFI
MCY - Mercury Green Bond offer - interest rate set
March 25th Morning Report
AFT - Chief Financial Officer update
KMD Brands: Response to Stokehouse transaction concept
March 24th Morning Report
MCY - Mercury launches retail Green Bond offer
Fonterra delivers another strong result for HY26
March 23th Morning Report