By David McEwen
Friday 13th October 2000
|Text too small?|
Despite the flak he attracted, he was right to warn of such an eventuality. Let's hope those with their hands on the levers of the economy keep an eye out for it.
Dr Brash is not the only person to use this term lately. Another who worries about stagflation and worse is Fred Bergsten, Director of the US-based Institute for International Economics.
In a recent speech he noted that globalisation was on the decline and that the effects of this could be greater than the awful period of stagflation of the 1970s.
He believes demonstrations against world trade and financial bodies around the world this year are only superficial signs of the real issue.
He cites a number of worrying trends. First, the international monetary system is crisis prone as can be seen from Europe in the early 1990s; Latin America in the mid 1990s and East Asia, Russia and Brazil in the last two or three years.
Second, the trading system has gone nowhere for several years and recent attempts to launch new trade talks have failed. "There are no new multilateral negotiations of any serious nature being conducted anywhere. The situation is very serious if, like me, believe in the bicycle theory, which says you either move forward or you fall over," he said.
His point is that there is a big backlash against globalisation. It can be seen in global finance trading trends.
Curiously, dissatisfaction with globalisation comes after a long period of prosperity and growth in many countries, especially in the US.
"It seems to me that all these things make the backlash all that more worrisome. If we have the manifestations I've indicated in a period of economic progress and success, what could be the outcome when the US economy inevitably slows down, unemployment begins to rise and a US$400 billion trade deficit becomes a huge target of attack and criticism? What if a similar downturn and more difficult economic times occur in the rest of the world?," he asked.
Economic woe is not inevitable and Mr Bergsten believes problems can be averted with:
Education "Much of the criticism of globalisation either reflects ignorance of the facts; or is sheer nonsense"
Recognition. "There are costs and losers. For too long, those of us on the proglobalisation side tried to ignore and deny this fact but it clearly must be accepted and admitted."
Reform. "We need much more openness and transparency of the financial system. We need much more effective means to coordinate exchange rates among the big countries."
Openness. "We need to restart true multilateral liberalisation of the global trading system, partly for momentum and bicycle reasons but partly to head off potentially destabilising regional steps."
These factors could all apply equally to New Zealand. Our weak dollar could lead to higher inflation and lower economic growth. If conditions worsen, interest rates may have to go up to attract international funds and support the dollar. However, higher rates could further depress the economy.
The result would be stagflation. Thank you Dr Brash, forewarned is forearmed.
David McEwen is an investment adviser and author of weekly share market newsletter McEwen's Investment Report. He is commissioned by the New Zealand Stock Exchange to write an independent personal investment column. He can be reached by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
No comments yet
High-emission oil producers at risk from investor action
NZ Rugby gets skin in media game in new Sky broadcasting deal
14th October 2019 Morning Report
US earnings season starts amid glimmers of hope on trade, Brexit
Class action suit against CBL Corp about to launch
NZ dollar benefits from possible US-China trade deal
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares rise; Sky TV recovers on rugby rights rumour
NZ dollar firms: Trump says China trade talks are
Kiwis spend more than expected in September
Red tape and levies cut in first phase of major Building Act overhaul