Sharechat Logo

Meridian's Hayes windfarm proposal gets another chance

Monday 16th August 2010

Text too small?

Meridian Energy is “delighted” to have won its High Court appeal allowing it to take its 630 Megawatt Otago wind farm proposal, Project Hayes, back to the Environment Court. 

The decision, released by the Dunedin High Court today, overturns a major change to resource consent assessment methods that could have affected any major infrastructure project. 

Meridian appealed the decision with the backing of other major infrastructure developers, who feared the precedent of a new test that required proof that a proposed development was the best economic alternative relative to any others in the country. 

That hurdle was judged to be impossibly high in many cases, since it would require the identification and evaluation of myriad possible alternative, as well as being an unintended extension of the Resource Management Act.

Instead, the Hayes project is likely to head back into familiar territory of assessing the project on its own merits, with the impact on iconic South Island landscapes being a primary bone of contention.

Meridian would consider the judgment before making further comment, a spokeswoman said. 

However, the chief executive of the New Zealand Wind Energy Association, Fraser Clark, said the judgment was good news for renewable energy projects, especially as the National Energy Strategy was confirming a target of 90% electricity from renewables. 

“To reach that target means we need to be able to look at those projects on their own merits, and in a timely fashion,” he said. “There is still no guarantee this project will receive consent, but it’s whether it’s the right project in the right place, rather than whether its merits are greater or less than others in other locations.” 

 

Businesswire.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

The Warehouse Group - Proposed Scheme of Arrangement
Winton announces timing of its Annual Results
Fletcher Building Announces Director Appointment
Meridian issues new demand response exercise notice to NZAS
CRP - Chatham Closes Private Placement of Shares
General Finance - Olympic Term Deposit Promotion featuring a Special Bonus of 0.1%
July 22nd Morning Report
VCT - Operational performance for the year ended 30 June 2024
Challenge to banks the way to go
Bigger returns or lower risk?