Friday 4th August 2000
|Text too small?|
How did they accomplish this? How did they balance their need to become wealthy and economically productive with their need to enjoy life?
They have the millionaire mind.
Early in my career of studying wealthy people, I had a glimpse of this segment of the millionaire population. In 1983 I was asked to interview sixty millionaires from Oklahoma. What I learned from them was simple, yet the message had a lasting impact on me: you cannot enjoy life if you are addicted to consumption and the use of credit. These Oklahoma millionaires were just the opposite, as demonstrated by one focus group of 10. All 10 were seasoned business owners, executives or professionals. All were first-generation wealthy. Some were credit-dependent earlier in their careers, but they eventually saw the light. They went cold turkey, breaking the cycle of borrowing to consume and earning to consume. Others never became addicted to credit or the need to display their success.
All 10 were multimillionaires. They lived in fine homes in well-established, older neighbourhoods. They enjoyed life. They were not workaholics. They spent a lot of time with their families and friends, borrowed little money and became wealthy, in most cases, before they were 45 years old. They believe that financial independence and much economic success can be achieved without adopting a Spartan lifestyle.
Importantly, these millionaires were not misers. Misers are controlled by greed. They even short-change their spouses and children. Money is their God. These people are not of the millionaire mind. One millionaire who has a more proper perspective told me: "I taught my sons and daughters that money is not their God. You control it ... [you don't] let it control you."
Most of the people I profile in my book The Millionaire Mind (based on a survey of 733 US millionaires) became economic successes in one generation. They came from economic ground zero. Most inherited no money. They never received the proceeds of an estate or income from a trust account. How did they do all this? They are of the millionaire mind. Here's what it looks like.
What are the top five factors most often mentioned by millionaires as the foundation stones? The most common factors picked by the 733 millionaires were:
Listen to how they describe themselves:
How important is intelligence in explaining variations in economic success? Not very. The millionaires described themselves as only average or just above average intelligence.
What school and college experiences influenced millionaires in becoming economically productive adults? Most told me they learned something about tenacity, getting along with people, self-discipline and discernment. A good portion of the millionaire population is made up of people who worked hard in school but did not graduate with all As. Those millionaires whose SATs were not spectacular say that:
What do most self-made millionaires have in common? They have courage. But having the courage to take financial risk doesn't mean that millionaires are gamblers. Few gamble at all. In fact, the higher a millionaire's net worth, the less likely he is to ever to gamble. Yet there is a positive correlation between taking financial risk and net worth.
Obviously, gambling and financial risk-taking are not the same type of behaviour. The most basic form of financial risk-taking relates to choice of occupation, or vocation. A disproportionately high percentage of millionaires, multimillionaires and decamillionaires are self-employed business owners and entrepreneurs or self-employed professionals. They say:
After studying millionaires for more than 20 years, I have concluded that if you make one major decision correctly, you can become economically productive. If you are creative enough to select the ideal vocation, you can win, big time. The really brilliant millionaires are those who selected a vocation that they love and one that has few competitors but generates high profits.
The millionaires say:
There is a substantial correlation between the number of years a couple is together and the wealth they accumulate. Over 90% of the 733 millionaires are married. Only 2% have never been married and about 2% are currently divorced or separated. The rest are widowed. Are there economies of scale associated with being married, as opposed to being single?
The data clearly show that the answer is yes. Does this mean that the two-career couple is the prototypical millionaire household? Not at all. In fact, the higher a couple's net worth, the more likely it is that the wife does not work outside the home. Contrast this with married couple households that produce high income but are not in the millionaire league: nearly 70% of the wives in those households work outside the home. They are employed as teachers, sales professionals, middle-level corporate executives and lawyers. Only about one wife in three in the deca-millionaire households works outside the home. The millionaires tell us:
Spend a week with these millionaires and you will conclude that their income and their shopping behaviour create a contradiction. On average, their annual net income is about $US750,000 and they have an average net worth of about $US9 million. Yet:
Why do so many millionaires choose older homes over newer homes? And houses with four bedrooms instead of eight or 10? It has something to do with the quality of the neighbourhoods where these houses are located. These are homogenous neighbourhoods in terms of socio-economic and educational characteristics. Most of the people in these neighbourhoods are successful. They are highly productive business owners, corporate executives, lawyers and doctors. To these people, "new" does not translate into "better" or "improved". As a cultural group they are trained to be "new sensitive".
Here's what else they say about their homes:
Far from the high-flying, jet-setting image of the rich, most of the millionaires in the study are what many would say are boring. When asked about their lifestyle they say:
Many may interpret the millionaires' lifestyles as dull, but in reality when I asked millionaires what they most learned in their salad years they say: "to think differently from the crowd".
It pays to be different. I have never been interested in studying "beautiful people". Interestingly, many of my correspondents have told me that if they were beautiful, partly beautiful or totally beautiful they would never had become so productive. Why? Because they would never have the need to be so very careful in selecting the ideal vocation, vocation, vocation.
Excerpts taken from The Millionaire Mind, by Thomas Stanley (HarperCollins, 2000). Available at bookstores.
$12 million (NBR Rich List 2000 valuation*)
The founder of PC Direct, Hunter now co-owns $20 million turnover, 50-person food company Continental Distributors; relauched as euroPacific Foods.
Seeing opportunities others don't see and. being willing to take financial risk: Lots of people see the opportunities but aren't prepared to take the risk. With PC Direct, we saw a problem to be solved and we reckoned we could provide a solution. Everyone said afterwards that there was a gap in the market. We were the only ones prepared to take the risk.
Having strong leadership qualities: As you start to employ people, you have to articulate the vision. Or you can't move forward.
Having a competitive spirit/personality: You have to want to be the best. Not necessarily the biggest, but the best.
Having an ability to sell ideas/products: Not in the traditional sense of being a good salesperson, but you have to be able to paint the picture of where you are going and sell it to a team.
Ignoring the criticism of detractors: There's a much bigger line of people waiting to tell you not to do it than there is of those urging you on.
Having extraordinary energy: You go to bed at night and your head is spinning with ideas. You wake up at 3am and it's still spinning. You have to have the energy to have your mind occupied a lot, particularly with a start-up.
Desire for autonomy/control: Wanting there to be a direct link between how well you perform and how successful you are.
Having an urge to be well respected/fear of failure: When you first start out in business, it's all risk, but then, as you get going, you worry about failing. Later, as you are more successful, you look for respect. When you've been successful and then start up another business, fear of failure, urge for respect and risk are all there together, right from the start.
Villa Maria Wines managing director
Honesty: Honesty creates trust and trust is the key ingredient in all business. Honesty also allows you to identify your strengths and weaknesses so you can then surround yourself with the right people
Passion: Passion for wine has meant we have pursued quality, a rewarding strategy. Passion for the business means we have worked harder than most to break into lucrative export markets. When you're passionate you don't think of it as work
People skills: Getting on with people is a bit like honesty - it means things work well
Niche orientation: Seeing opportunities others don't see, then being willing to take calculated risks, is what creates businesses
Total self-belief: I'm surprised this doesn't appear in the [Stanley] list, because this is critical to taking risks. Mixed with honesty, total belief in yourself is in my top five success factors
New Zealand's most successful model Rachel Hunter didn't return our calls, but from what we can stitch together she is in many ways the archetypal millionaire Stanley describes. Estimated to be worth $20 million by The NBR Rich List 2000, she is a first-generation millionaire, with a modest school record, a strong work ethic and an encouraging home background. Like most of Stanley's subjects she has strong social skills: "She has a very strong network in the entertainment industry and makes sure she is at most premieres and important events," comments Woman's Day editor Michele Crawshaw. She lives in a cluster of similarly wealthy and successful people (it's called Beverly Hills) and though her career was launched by good fortune, getting rich from it has not been left to chance. In one key area the Glenfield glampuss departs from her fellow millionaires. Whereas 92% of Stanley's millionaires partly attribute their success to a successful marriage, Hunter's separation from train-set playing husband Rod Stewart only seems to have helped her career.
Founder of Aoraki Corporation
Courage: This is different from taking risks. It's being able to stand there while the storms of public opinion, staff, colleagues assail the position you've adopted. If you are able to go into a scary space and stick to your ground, people will believe in you. When you are successful you are exposed to criticism. Many people are scared of criticism or rejection. But remember, courage is different from stubbornness - refusing to admit you've made a mistake. I like the Egyptian tank image: two forward gears and six reverse
Humility: Not taking credit for things that others have done. This makes employees more successful and my success is built on the success of others. A successful movie director needs his stars to be winning academy awards
Being objective in all things: Emotion and making money doesn't work. In negotiations, for example, you need to understand why the other side is doing what it's doing
Having the highest regard for and confidence in people: If you let people do their own things they are far more creative and productive. Management's job is to remove impediments to them achieving things
Seeing things others don't see: Otherwise you won't be able to inspire others.
Being able to answer the question, 'What if I succeed?': It's a more difficult question than 'What if I fail?'. Failure is easy - you cancel your Sky subscription and stop going out to dinner. But you have to answer the question 'If I succeed and have to expand, where do I go?' Or, 'If I had to hire 50 more staff, what would I do with them.'
Having a supportive spouse: Not essential for success, but there's no question it makes you happier and I believe you do your job better.
A sense of humour: In every business there's going to be conflict. A sense of humour helps relieve the tension.
Good fortune: I'd like to believe good fortune comes the way of us all. Successful people are prepared to take the opportunity when it occurs.
Author Graeme Hunt knows something about being rich, not because he is rich (he's not), but because the long-time editor of NBR's Rich List has just completed a history of New Zealand's rich. We asked Hunt for their common characteristics:
Rich settlers had an almost blissful ignorance of what could be done. It's the same sort of enthusiasm you see in the dot-com generation. Many of the settlers were only in their 20s when they began their entrepreneurial pursuits and hadn't fought with banks or depressions. People like John Logan Campbell and Thomas Russell had a sense of invincibility and achieved amazing things as a result.
The rich have always been in the knowledge economy. When the wool price collapsed in the 1870s, people like John Grigg and William Davidson took a big punt on untried refrigeration technology, sending thousands of dollars worth of carcasses to England. Those that stuck to wool suffered, while Grigg and Davidson prospered.
The rich have always formed incredible networks such as the 'Tartan Mafia', that group of speculative Dunedinites with a hint of Scottish ancestry that dominates the South Island investment market. There's nothing new in this. In the 19th century, and probably up to World War II, Methodist traders in Auckland and Jews, mostly merchants in Auckland and Wellington, operated their own networks with great success. In a thin capital market, without the safety nets we associate with business today, such networks proved a lifeline.
Debt and risk managers
The same things that made people rich made them poor: debt and risk. The difference is the rich manage them better. Sourcing capital has always been a key in New Zealand; and still is. The rich have great connections and the ability to pick trends.
No comments yet
NZ dollar falls against Aussie after jobs data there
Sky CEO put on notice by chunky vote against salary share scheme
Unions gearing up to oppose 'market tests' on Fair Pay Agreements
Mandatory farm plans scorned as 'tick box' exercises
Kiwi dollar firms on weak US retail data, capped by rate-cut expectations
17th October 2019 Morning Report
SkyCity hoses down union claims over potential job losses
OPINION: Fair Payment Agreements and 'swallowing vomit' - the lot of the CTU
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares gain; Restaurant Brands climbs on upbeat outlook
NZ dollar stalls after Bascand's rate cut comments