Sharechat Logo

High Court approves class suit against Southern Response over earthquake claims

Friday 16th December 2016

Text too small?

Christchurch's High Court has approved a second attempt by a group of Southern Response Earthquake Services policyholders to bring a representative action against the Crown-owned insurance company for breach of contract.

In February this year, the High Court rejected the initial attempt by 46 individuals, who had similar insurance policies and were in dispute with Southern Response over damage caused to their homes in the Canterbury earthquakes, saying their claims were too varied.

A second attempt to proceed with the class action was launched in October, with 40 individuals saying Southern Response consistently delayed house repairs and underestimated claims. A court-sanctioned opt-in order means other Southern Response policyholders have until April 16 next year to join the class action.

Southern Response was established following the quake on Feb. 22 2011, when insurance company AMI considered it did not have sufficient reserve funds or reinsurance to cover its liability. The Crown injected $500 million and provided access to further funding, AMI was restructured, and its day-to-day insurance business sold to Australian insurance group IAG. Its liability from the Canterbury earthquakes transferred to Southern Response.

In a statement, Grant Cameron, a partner at GCA Lawyers which is representing the policyholders, said the group was looking forward to early progress.

Cameron said Justice David Gendall had been satisfied that the common interest pleaded by the plaintiffs - which is that Southern Response engaged in a deliberate strategy to deceive policyholders and delay claims in order to reduce financial liability - was sufficient for a representative action.

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

May 1st Morning Report
GTK - Gentrack's Veovo Acquires Dubai Technology Partners
SML - Additional information following Bright Dairy announcement
April 30th Morning Report
Rua Bioscience Market Update
FSF - Fonterra announces interim leadership changes
April 29th Morning Report
NZK - Blue Endeavour Pilot Farm and Wellboat Update
TRU - FY 31 March 2026 Revenue and Results Guidance Achieved
FBU - Fletcher Building sale of Fletcher Reinforcing and Wire