Support our sponsors:

NZX 50 Index	4611.96	2.40
S&P/ASX 200	5191.20	0.00
Dow Jones Industrials	14839.80	21.00

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Transport Minister Brownlee won't divulge government interest in Auckland port dispute

Friday 23rd March 2012 2 Comments

Text too small?

Transport Minister Gerry Brownlee won’t divulge the government’s interest in the Ports of Auckland dispute, declining an Official Information Act request from the Council of Trade Unions for details of its thinking.

The CTU wrote to the minister in February requesting, “all information and advice that has been prepared by the Ministry of Transport for the Minister of Transport since 1 January 2011.”

“The reason we declined the request is because it is out of scope,” a spokesman for Brownlee. The minister is reviewing the files and may yet release them, he said.

Brownlee declined to release any documents to the CTU under the OIA, sayint the release wasn’t in the public interest.

Among the sections of the act Brownlee cited for his blanket refusal were those protecting the confidentiality of advice tendered by ministers or officials, the free and frank discussion by officials and the unreasonable prejudice and damage to public interest or the commercial position of a person.

“Brownlee needs to explain to Aucklanders what he is withholding,” Helen Kelly, CTU president said in a statement. “There is a clear public interest in knowing what our transport minister is being told about this dispute.”

The port met with the Maritime Union today to discuss when workers would return to work. Union members have been on strike for the past 4 weeks.

The company said in a statement that it told the union that it couldn’t expect an immediate return to work for its members because of the significant disruption to shipping schedules caused from ongoing strike action.

BusinessDesk.co.nz

Comments from our readers

On 23 March 2012 at 5:43 pm MIke Smith said:

Can they really refuse this request? Or is just a delaying tactic?

On 24 March 2012 at 5:27 pm Silverone said:

This whole thing is a bit crazy. Does anybody know if the claim that the workers get on average $96000.00 a year for 40hour per week but in fact only work 26 hours. I may of missed any denial but if its true most of us have been working in the wrong place.

Add your comment:

Your name:
Your email:	Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.