By Peter V O'Brien
|
Friday 5th April 2002 |
Text too small? |
| Table I: PORTS OF AUCKLAND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The issue was raised at the 2001 annual meeting in October when shareholders were told the company would return $132 million to shareholders.
Chairman Neville Darrow said the repayment would involve the cancellation of one share for every five shares held.
"The board has taken independent advice on the most appropriate capital structure going forward and on the most suitable option for the capital redistribution.
"We have decided on returning capital to shareholders because this approach provides certainty for shareholders and gives an equal opportunity for all shareholders to benefit. It is cost-effective and reasonably simple to carry out."
Mr Darrow said the company's total interest-bearing debt to debt plus equity would be about 50%. He said that was still considered a conservative gearing level.
The October calculations were based on a payout of $5 for each share cancelled but that time has gone.
Delays in getting binding rulings from Inland Revenue and other matters forced the company to delay the appropriate release of a shareholders' disclosure document to Monday, March 25.
That was at the cutoff time for NBR Personal Investor - due to Easter - so the following discussion is based on figures subject to later amendment.
That hardly matters because figures used here were only examples of what happens when companies make capital repayment decisions.
Ports of Auckland's proposal involved a capital reduction of (then) $5 a share on 26.5 million shares, a dividend content of $16.5 million from retained earnings and creation of a negative "share cancellation reserve" of $90 million.
The table shows Ports of Auckland's statement of financial position at June 30 last year and an adjusted position if the capital cancellation happened at that date.
June 30 figures were used, because they were audited, rather than unaudited December 31 accounts.
It is emphasised the table has nothing to do with what a special meeting of shareholders will consider. The table is a "frinstance" situation, showing what happens when companies change their financial structures.
Ports of Auckland has to consider a shareholder proposal to pay $2 million to employees as a bonus and repay $130 million of capital.
The table ignores the proposal's effect on shareholders but assumes the company will raise $132 million of debt to pay for the capital cancellation and adjust the statement of financial position.
A rise in Ports of Auckland's share price in recent months, possibly in part anticipating the share cancellation, was another complication. It does not affect the general favourable reorganisation of the June 30 statement of financial position.
No comments yet
May 19th Morning Report
PYS - PaySauce to announce F26 full year results on 27 May 2026
PEB - Draft LCD Proposes Medicare Coverage for Triage and Triage
MEL - Meridian Energy monthly operating report for April 2026
FBU - Sale of South Australian property
AIR - Air New Zealand market update
May 14th Morning Report
PEB - Pacific Edge Placement Increased to NZ$25.4 Million
Radius Care Reports Earnings Growth and 50% Higher Dividend
May 13th Morning Report