His arguments were full of non sequiturs, and when his straw man was
knocked down he raised the white flag, in typical doctrinaire fashion (meaning:
flinging ad hominens around and running away while declaring victory). A
high school debater could do better.
High fives all round Phaedrus.
We have a saying over here, "what comes
around goes around".
I quote from your diatribe to
..."your reply clearly shows that you are loathe to answer my
because they are red herrings, but simply because they expose
of your analysis".
"...your comments are
"The reason you did not answer my questions were
"...typically used as a smokescreen from idiots who
self-appoint themselves to
"I'm sure there will be
plenty of people who believe your
Now to make my point. You posted a statement a short time ago
saying the US
would nuke China, but not before this Christmas. Tongue
in cheek, I responded
that that it was comforting to know we had at least
until Christmas. I then
asked you for a not later than date and
received an answer that was waffle, not
answered, a smokescreen, and
simplistic nonsense. You were loath to give any
time in the future and
for good reason. As that date passed you would be
what you are. A, I'LL LET OUR READERS FILL IN THE CONCLUDING