| 
		
			Printable version | 
		
| From: | "David & Jill Stevenson" <djstevo@quicksilver.net.nz> | 
| Date: | Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:15:12 +1300 | 
| 
 Hi Macdunk, 
                   
You are quite right. On reflection I tend to defeat my own argument when I 
examine my own attitude towards the immediate position in NZ 
-- in the provinces and smaller towns. We have the Warehouse moving into 
the main streets and throttling the life-blood out of small family businesses 
arguing that they provide jobs for the young. Those traditional small one man 
businesses have not a hope of competing with the cheap imported  goods that 
the Warehouse displays. 
Every one should be encouraged to follow their 
dream of having their own business no matter how modest. The Warehouse`s 
unnecessary, I believe, inroads into rural and dying towns is destroying 
those dreams .We are defeating our aims of breathing life back  into 
the provinces.  
         In 
the wider argument, when Bush introduced increased farmer subsidies the Chairman 
of the Senate Agriculture Committee said -"We stick up for our farmers --we work 
out what we feel is best for our producers and farmers ,not what is best for 
Germany,France,Brazil and China"  You and I macdunk would agree those are 
pretty honest and blunt words. A change from the political double-talk and 
waffle we are used to from politicians. 
        But when 
you have other branches of US Government waffling on about relaxation of trade 
barriers an observer could reasonably ask  -yes, but whart exactly is the 
official position in light of these differing statements. 
        We have 
a world becoming rapidly internationalised > Soon the only barriers existing 
will be trade barriers. What is the answer ? In the 18th and 19th centuries 
Colonialism dragged the then 3rd world screaming into the " real" "world . 
Now that Colonialism has been all but dismantled or is a PC dirty word what 
other agency do we use ? 
        I 
realise some will argue these opinions are outside the province of shares . To a 
T/A  maybe . Not so to a F/A who can`t avoid history or looking into the 
future before the next person . Our`s are not kneejerk actions. 
Regards  
                       
David S.  
 | 
  |