Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - September 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] Borrowed money & Southport


From: Derek <dkw@paradise.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:39:41 +1200


Hi,
Are there any economist-types out there who can help me understand this
statement by Southport - 

"As at 31 August 2000, South Port carries no debt on its balance sheet. In
the period under review, term liabilities declined to $5m ($8.4m) and have
nowbeen repaid in full. Mr O'Connor says that in coming months South Port
will be communicating to shareholders a recommendation to establish a more
commercial mix of debt and shareholders' equity (currently standing at
$30.9m after allowing for dividend payments of $1.8m during the period).
This is likely to involve apro-rata offer to buy back shares using funding
from bank debt." 

I don't understand this, does this mean that they aspire to be another FFS? 
Being in a debt-free situation seems like a plus to me.

Derek





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
http://www.netbroker.co.nz/        Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

Replies

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] Student loans and investing from a young point of view. jesse
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] Student loans and investing from a young point of view. Out to lunch ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: RE: [sharechat] Borrowed money & Southport Gordon King
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Borrowed $$....Philip Brian Gale ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]