Sharechat Logo

Peters pins $2B-plus 'losses' to NZ on Fonterra

Tuesday 19th June 2018

Text too small?

Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters doubled down on last week's New Zealand First party attacks on the performance and leadership of Fonterra, saying the country's largest business was costing the economy more than $2 billion from food safety and animal welfare scares.

Speaking at the weekly post-Cabinet press conference in the absence of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, Peters said in reference to Fonterra: "I think we will not become a great, first world trading nation in the top of the world’s trading nations until we face some blunt, commercial facts" and that "I do believe in commercial accountability".

Regional Economic Development Minister, Shane Jones, who is a NZ First party minister like Peters, last week called for Fonterra's chairman to "take the first cab out of town" and resign over the cooperative's commercial performance in comments that Ardern characterised as 'private' rather than made in a ministerial capacity.

Peters stuck to that line but backed Jones, saying: "We made our comments on Fonterra a long, long time before the last election."

Apparently referring to food safety scares earlier this decade, Peters said the cost of Fonterra decisions to the economy had been $1.383 billion, "including $100 million of taxpayers’ money trying to sort things out on the wharves and docksides of China".

A further $800 million cost loomed, he said, apparently referring to the estimated cost of the programme to eradicate the mycoplasma bovis bacteria from the national beef and dairy herd.

A review of special rules relating to Fonterra's operations, governed by the Dairy Industry Restructuring Act, is currently occurring and Peters left open the suggestion the review could yet lead to a break-up of the cooperative, which was formed in 2001 in an effort to give the New Zealand dairy industry global competitive scale.

"It is possible in a thorough review that conclusions emerge which weren’t apparent at the time when you set the terms of reference," he said, while noting that Fonterra itself wanted reforms.

"They, for example, don’t want to be required to supply all and sundry, including their export competitors."


  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Spark scolded for misleading customers on broadband price hike
Zespri annual profit jumps 77% on higher kiwifruit sales, increased licensing
Freightways says express package growth slowed in 2H, may flow into FY2020
BUDGET 2019: NZ debt target to be more flexible from 2022
Argosy annual profit climbs 36% on revaluation gains, pays slightly bigger dividend
NZ-owned banks says RBNZ capital proposals will make it harder to compete
Sanford earnings hit by vessel impact from crew death
Metroglass' Australian woes drag annual net profit down 69%
Fonterra says more assets under review as it cuts guidance, narrows forecast payout
Active, planning role urged for new infrastructure body

IRG See IRG research reports