About Us  |   Advertise  |   Contact Us  |   Terms & Conditions  |   RSS Feeds
 
Support our sponsors:
sharemarket

Appeal Court rules Dotcom search warrants valid, says cloned info shouldn't have left NZ

Wednesday 19th February 2014

Text too small?

The Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of government submissions that search warrants executed during the high-profile arrest of Mega founder Kim Dotcom in January 2012 were valid, though it agreed that the police shouldn't have let cloned information leave the country.

Justices Ellen France, Tony Randerson and Douglas White granted the Crown's appeal against an order declaring the warrants invalid, saying "the defects were defects in form not in substance," according to a judgment released today.

"In our view a reasonable reader in the position of the recipients of the search warrants would have understood what they related to," the judges said. "The defects in these warrants were therefore not so radical as to require them to be treated as nullities."

The Attorney-General appealed a High Court ruling that declared the search warrants invalid by not being specific enough, by not stating the electronic nature of the copyright offence, or that the US was the nation where Dotcom was alleged to have broken the law and to where he was facing extradition.

The Appeal Court didn't agree with the Crown that the Police Commissioner was allowed to hand over cloned copies of information harvested from devices seized in the raid to the US Federal Bureau of Investigations without direction from the Solicitor-General.

"In our view, the words of the Solicitor-General's direction in the present case plainly did not authorise removal of the clones to the United States," the judges said.

"Once it is accepted that s49 (of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1992) is not limited to custody of the original thing seized, but encompasses removal of the clones, the wording of the direction applied to require the Commissioner to retain 'custody and control' of the clones here in New Zealand 'until further direction' from the Solicitor-General," they said.

In that respect, the judges upheld a High Court declaration that the removal of the clones from New Zealand wasn't authorised and was unlawful.

The judges considered Dotcom and his co-accused should pay 60 percent of the costs of the Attorney-General.

The Nov. 28 hearing is part of a series of legal challenges to head off the US Federal Government's bid to extradite Dotcom and his co-accused Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk to face charges of conspiracy to operate websites used to illegally distribute copyrighted content.

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz



Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.
Bookmark and Share   Printable version
Related News

NZ dollar rises as terms of trade hold at 40-year high
Gentrack secures delayed contract, shares rise to month high
Datacom boosts profit 43% as strong NZ growth offsets weaker Australia, Asia
NZ Dollar Outook: Kiwi may decline this week as weaker data weighs
NZ terms of trade sets new 40-year high as cheaper imports offset falling exports
APN may list local unit on New Zealand sharemarket
Allied Farmers back in black as livestock unit grows
NZ dollar rises to 4-month high vs. Russian ruble on rising tensions over Ukraine
Brierley sells A$2.7 mln of GPG shares
World Week Ahead: Focus on US jobs, ECB

 
Previous News
Bond
News Alerts
Breaking News 
After the Bell (daily) 
Gold News 

Unsubscribe/Update »

RSS feeds »
Twitter »
Facebook »

Most Commented On
  forex centre
cfd centre
options centre
NZX 15 Index
   





© Copyright 2014 MoneyOnline Ltd & Investment Research Group Ltd. All Rights Reserved.