Sharechat Logo

'Complex' EQC law review set to drag on into next year

Thursday 27th October 2016

Text too small?

The long-running Treasury-led review of the Earthquake Commission's funding and policy structures is set to drag into the 2017 election year as consultation on proposed changes throws up a number of thorny issues. 

The government's financial adviser put up a series of proposals in July last year, with the preferred options to double EQC's payout amount, scrap contents insurance and process claims through private insurers. Submissions closed on Sept. 11, 2015, and the government had intended to introduce legislation early this year, though the Treasury today said it was still actively working on the review. 

"This phase has taken longer than expected due to the complexity of the issues and ongoing engagement with insurance industry stakeholders," a spokesman said in an emailed statement. "Ministers have made no decisions regarding the timing of the release of submissions or introduction of an EQC bill. Officials anticipate that it will be sometime in 2017."

The government has already got a hurry-up on the review, putting out last year's discussion document five months after global reinsurers publicly grumbled that the delays were making it difficult for them to operate in an uncertain environment. 

The review was launched in September 2012 to gauge the government's disaster contingency fund's future after its resources were exhausted by the Canterbury quakes that caused billions of dollars of damage and killed 185 people. The decision was initially meant to be wrapped up by mid-2013. 

EQC has been participating in the review, and in its 2014-18 statement of intent, it says it believes the act has "performed well and is fundamentally sound", though there was room to improve  "in terms of increasing clarity and reducing complexity".

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

SPG - Change to Executive Team
BGI - Forgiveness of $200,000 of secured indebtedness
General Capital Subsidiary General Finance Market Update
AFT,Massey Ventures,Gilles McIndoe to develop scar treatmen
April 24th Morning Report
Cheers to many fewer grape harvest spills
GTK - Half-Year Results Announcement Date
Government ends war on farming
Sky and BBC Studios renew expanded, multi-year agreement
AOF - Q1 Improved Trading Performance & FY24 Guidance Maintained