Sharechat Logo

'Left with a sea of paper,' says judge at end of NZX, Ralec case

Wednesday 13th July 2016

Text too small?

The High Court judge hearing the extended dispute between NZX and the former owners of the Australian Clear Grain Exchange summed up the case by telling the lawyers involved that they would happily leave at the end of the day, while he would be "left with a sea of paper."

In the case, which commenced on May 2 and concludes today, the stock market operator claimed Clear’s former owners, Grant Thomas and Dominic Pym, and their companies Ralec Commodities and Ralec Interactive misled NZX with “wildly inaccurate” forecasts when it bought the commodities trading platform for $A7 million in October 2009, with two earn-outs of A$7 million tied to performance. NZX's claim is for between A$20.7 million and A$37.6 million.

Ralec's counterclaim of A$14 million is for earn-outs plus bonuses, claiming NZX and former chief Mark Weldon under-funded the business which meant it couldn't meet the targets which would trigger those payments.

The trial was initially set down for nine weeks, but Justice Robert Dobson accepted an extension mid-May to allow for the 40 witnesses who were still due to give evidence. 

The case pre-dates much of NZX's existing management, having first hit the courts in 2011. The stock market operator's chief executive, Tim Bennett, has said its total legal cost will amount to between $9-10 million by the end of the trial, not including time spent on the litigation by internal staff. 

Bennett also said that NZX did not believe it would make a loss from Ralec's counterclaim, and therefore had made no provision for that. 

Today in court, Ralec's QC Tim North summarised Clear's arguments, with NZX's counsel replying this afternoon. 

 

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

SPG - Change to Executive Team
BGI - Forgiveness of $200,000 of secured indebtedness
General Capital Subsidiary General Finance Market Update
AFT,Massey Ventures,Gilles McIndoe to develop scar treatmen
April 24th Morning Report
Cheers to many fewer grape harvest spills
GTK - Half-Year Results Announcement Date
Government ends war on farming
Sky and BBC Studios renew expanded, multi-year agreement
AOF - Q1 Improved Trading Performance & FY24 Guidance Maintained