By Chris Hutching
Friday 14th July 2000 |
Text too small? |
The company has yet to take advice from its counsel, John Fogarty QC, about taking an appeal but Apple Fields directors are reluctant to let the matter drop because they feel some key legal issues were not addressed in the ruling by Justice John Hansen.
The key issue was whether financier Ken Smith acted properly in his role as mortgagee of the property and his involvement in the joint venture company with developer Robin Hughes who bought the land.
Justice Hansen concluded the complicated structure of the sale involving a series of contracts between several companies had benefited Apple Fields by $21 million because ANZ Bank wrote off $8 million of a debt it was owed.
He said Apple Fields wanted only part of the deal unwound, not the bit involving the write-off.
Justice Hansen said Apple Fields was being opportunistic in trying to take advantage of the unusual situation after the event.
He criticised Apple Fields founder Tom Kain for trying to take financial advantage of what occurred at the time by asking for more money for an adjacent block of land he owned. Mr Kain has refused to settle the sale.
No comments yet
Skellerup achieves another record result
August 21st Morning Report
Me Today signals capital raise and provides trading update
Seeka Announces Interim Result and Updates Guidance
FBU - Fletcher Building announces FY25 Results
August 20th Morning Report
RUA - New Zealand grown products support Rua's global strategy
Devon Funds Morning Note - 19 August 2025
Seeka Announces 15 cent Dividend
MCY - Major renewable build advanced despite 10% earnings dip