By Ray Lilley
Friday 21st July 2000
|Text too small?|
The tribunal decision slates the union for the legal tactics it used to try to have a worker reinstated after he was sacked for a serious breach of safety regulations.
Tribunal adjudicator Richard Hall ruled Tranz Rail's dismissal was justified after the worker caused a collision between two pieces of track machinery.
The collision caused $34,000 in damage as well as injuring a fellow worker.
The second mishap caused by the track worker in three months, came after safety training, a formal reprimand and a written warning that no repeat of the first incident should occur.
When the worker was sacked after the second smash, the union claimed he was dismissed without substantive justification and that Tranz Rail was guilty of procedural defects.
The ruling from the tribunal upholds the company's procedure for sacking the worker as fair and reasonable, while noting the union "challenge[d] or put in issue as many matters as possible and some issues that ... were of little merit."
Mr Hall said the union's approach resulted in a 938-page transcript, nine days of hearing before the tribunal, as well as Employment and Appeal Court time, and left the worker "dangling" without a resolution of the issue for a year.
Tranz Rail said the ruling upheld its right to insist that safety codes designed to protect workers be adhered to.
It had made it clear breaches of company safety codes meant the worker involved was likely to lose his job in the interests of protecting everyone's safety.
The tribunal dismissed claims by the union the Maori worker concerned was unfairly treated by the procedures used because Tranz Rail had insufficient regard to "cultural sensitivities and cultural differences."
"I firmly conclude this claim has no merit," Mr Hall said.
"It seems to me that [Tranz] Rail has gone out of its way to cater for Maori sensitivities and cultural differences."
It also found there was no disparity in the treatment for the sacked worker compared with cases of workers involved in other similar incidents.
The worker had had his attention drawn to the safe following distances for track machinery just three months before the crash, when he was responsible for a similar but less dangerous accident.
The ruling found Tranz Rail was procedurally fair in that it:
The tribunal said the worker was experienced, well aware of safety requirements, of the seriousness of his responsibilities "and he did not meet them."
The company said the decision involved a huge issue of support for its safety standards.
"I am relieved to see the company's efforts to maintain high standards in pursuit of safety were supported through this decision," Tranz Rail counsel Phillip Green said.
The government has set up a formal inquiry into Tranz Rail's safety procedures after five workers died in a little over a year in shunting- yard accidents.
No comments yet
Class action suit against CBL Corp about to launch
NZ dollar benefits from possible US-China trade deal
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares rise; Sky TV recovers on rugby rights rumour
NZ dollar firms: Trump says China trade talks are
Kiwis spend more than expected in September
Red tape and levies cut in first phase of major Building Act overhaul
More dairy needed to achieve sustainable global diet - Fonterra
New Zealand manufacturers still struggling
Walmart US boss flies home as incoming Air NZ CEO
Michael Hill Q1 sales rise 9.7%; margin compression continues