Sharechat Logo

Trans-Tasman regulator info-sharing a step closer

Friday 4th May 2012

Text too small?

Legislation enabling antitrust regulators in Australia and New Zealand to share information is a step closer after languishing at the bottom of the government's programme for two years.

The Commerce Commission (International Cooperation and Fees) Bill passed its second reading in Parliament yesterday with unanimous support.

The legislation has been sitting near the bottom of the order paper since it was first introduced in September 2008, having passed its first reading in May 2010, something Commerce Minister Craig Foss put down to the government's "significant legislative programme."

Foss tabled a supplementary order paper to amend the Telecommunications Act to "promote enhanced cooperation between the Commerce Commission and overseas regulators with respect to telecommunications investigations," such as issues relating to international mobile roaming, he told the House.

The bill was flagged as one of the laggards in the February Trans-Tasman Outcomes Implementation Group (TTOIG) report, which monitors the progression towards a single economic market between New Zealand and Australia.

Once passed, the bill will let the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission and New Zealand's Commerce Commission and other foreign antitrust regulators share confidential information for enforcement efforts.

The minister adopted the Commerce Committee's recommendations to let regulator cooperation agreements to be used as an alternative to intergovernmental arrangements and also to protect New Zealand's economic interests.

"It will ensure that the commission will provide assistance that aligns with our international trade interests," he said.

Members of Parliament who spoke to the bill were generally glowing in their support of the legislation, though Labour MP David Cunliffe took a jab at the government's apparent stance on a single economic market from "doing what is in New Zealand's national interests, which one would have thought was their day job, to doing what is in the joint interests of Australia and New Zealand."

The danger in taking that position is that "New Zealand's interests tend to get a bit swamped by the big fella over the ditch," Cunliffe said.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

NZ dollar eases on technical factors, buoyed by higher dairy prices
RBNZ eyes Westpac Australia money laundering failures
Heritage buys Golden Healthcare; not mystery Metlife suitor
Alliance margins improve as swine fever boosts global meat prices
RBNZ eyes Westpac Australia money laundering failures
Precinct eyes new developments as Commercial Bay keeps to revised schedule
End to Tower's three year dividend drought in sight
Vital Healthcare's manager appoints new independent director
Argosy lifts first-half profit 15.2% on valuation gains
Metlifecare attracts 'credible' bidder after biggest trading day in 2 1/2 years

IRG See IRG research reports