Sharechat Logo

Government wrestles stakeholders for Air NZ

By Nick Stride

Friday 28th September 2001

Text too small?
TOUGH TUSSLE: Brierley CEO Greg Terry and Prime Minister Helen Clark are locked in a negotiation armwrestle
Disguised by the daily public barrage of Air New Zealand pronouncements, a deadly armwrestle is under way between the government and the airline's major shareholders.

At risk for Brierley Investments and Singapore Airlines, which together hold 55% of Air New Zealand's shares, are more than $1 billion of investments.

Air New Zealand needs, by most airline analysts' calculations, at least a further billion of equity to become viable. At June 30 the airline had debt of $2.4 billion and equity of $518 million but that will have been eroded further by the losses the airline has been sustaining in recent weeks.

SIA and BIL face an unenviable situation.

The Singaporean carrier in August last year paid $567 million for a 25% holding in B shares, buying a 17% stake from BIL and topping up on-market.

At that time BIL's 30% holding in A shares was worth $425 million.

At this week's lows of 17c for the B shares and 18c for the As, SIA was showing a paper loss of 94% of its investment and BIL 91%.

The questions now are how much more money they are prepared to commit to the rescue plan and at what the price they will get further shares.

SIA has already baulked at paying the $1.31 a share originally agreed on. Under a second agreement BIL and SIA committed to pay 67c a share. But with the price bouncing around at, at best, half that amount, they will have trouble explaining to their shareholders why they agreed to pay so much.

But at this week's share-price lows the $300 million the two have previously agreed to commit would buy them, added to their existing shareholdings, 86% of the airline.

For its part the government is reported to be unwilling to commit public money to shore up the airline if that will have the effect of transferring wealth from the New Zealand taxpayer to SIA and BIL's shareholders.

It has told Air New Zealand's board to knock the shareholders' heads together and come up with a workable plan.

Air New Zealand's independent directors have leverage over BIL and SIA in that they can threaten to ask the government to appoint a statutory manager.

Insolvency experts say the manager has powers to tip Air New Zealand's assets into a new company and leave its shareholders and creditors high and dry. But, they say, the statutory management option has huge risks attached.

If the government agreed to appoint a manager it would face a political backlash from minority shareholders, who would lose their investments. Also to be taken into account would be the damage to New Zealand's reputation as an attractive country in which to trade and invest.

Finance Minister Michael Cullen has also pointed out that, under statutory management, Air New Zealand would face the risk its aircraft and other assets could be seized by creditors in overseas jurisdictions.

Insolvency practitioners say the issue is complicated.

New Zealand companies face different regimes in different countries according to what protocol, if any, has been agreed on.

In the UK, for instance, the protocol recognises the New Zealand insolvency regime for the assets of New Zealand-based companies.

British creditors can't jump ahead of the queue by seizing assets in their own jurisdiction.

Different rules apply in Australia, the US and Asian countries.

So, as Dr Cullen has pointed out, before a manager could be appointed, deals would have to be done with those countries in which Air New Zealand's assets would be at risk.

Whether a manager was appointed or not some sort of compromise may also have to be negotiated with the administrator of Air New Zealand's defunct subsidiary Ansett.

Air New Zealand acting chairman Jim Farmer has said a "corporate veil" shields Air New Zealand shareholders from any exposure to Ansett's liabilities.

The administrator has also estimated the value of Ansett's assets exceed its debts.

But until these matters are determined conclusively it is possible any injection of capital, either by the government or by SIA and BIL, will end up in Ansett creditors' pockets.

The uncertainty over the Ansett position is further complicating the due diligence process the government, SIA and BIL are undertaking.

Any request from Air New Zealand to appoint a manager would also have to go through the full process. As one analyst put it, "without that the independent directors could face a very expensive lawsuit from BIL and SIA."

It is understood the Air New Zealand board has given itself a deadline of today in which to take a fresh rescue plan to the government.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

TRU - WHO Agency UNITAID Features TRU in Tech Landscape Report
PaySauce Quarterly Market Update - September 2024
October 2nd Morning Report
Rua Releases Annual Report for Year Ended 30 June 2024
SCL - Settlement of orchard sales
The Warehouse Group 2024 ASM and Director Nominations
AIR - Update on Chief Operational Integrity and Safety Officer
Comvita Limited - Annual Report 2024
September 27th Morning Report
Spark announces departure of Finance Director