Sharechat Logo

Ross Investments fined for misleading offer to investors

Thursday 20th April 2006 1 Comment

Text too small?
An Australian investment company and its Director have been fined a total of $24,000 for misleading claims made when trying to buy capital bonds and units from New Zealand investors.

In the District Court at Auckland, Robert Douglas Ross was fined $8,000 and`Ross Investments was fined $16,000 for breaching the Fair Trading Act by making misleading claims.

Between August 2004 and March 2005 Ross Investments wrote to thousands of capital bond and unit holders of two New Zealand companies, Vector and Kiwi Income Property Trust (KIPT). The letters implied that Vector and KIPT were in financial difficulties and that, to dispose of bonds and units that would otherwise be difficult to sell, investors should sell them to Ross Investments.

In fact both Vector and KIPT were in a good financial state, and the price offered by Ross was significantly below market value. Approximately 20 investors took up Ross's offer.

The misleading claims had cost the companies involved, Commerce Commission Director of Fair Trading Deborah Battell says, with
Vector and KIPT spending an estimated total of $42,000 on contacting shareholders to correct Ross's misleading claims, and on legal advice.

Battell says that Ross had twice been warned by the Commission in 2003 over similar misleading representations. At an interview in 2005, a Commission investigator told Ross that the Commission considered the letter sent to KIPT investors was misleading. Two weeks after the interview, Ross sent a letter making the same claims to hundreds of Vector investors.

"Mr Ross paid the penalty for ignoring Commerce Commission warnings," Battell says. "The Commission hopes this criminal conviction and fine will ensure that Mr Ross finally stops his attempts to mislead New Zealand shareholders."

Battell says that the case was particularly significant because it involved the successful prosecution of an Australian based company and individual in the New Zealand courts.

"While the Commission will take action to stop traders misleading the public," Ms Battell adds, "the best protection for consumers is to seek independent financial advice when considering investment options."

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

On 17 September 2011 at 1:03 am joanne nelson said:
beware dr robert ross is still active
Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Mandatory farm plans scorned as 'tick box' exercises
Kiwi dollar firms on weak US retail data, capped by rate-cut expectations
17th October 2019 Morning Report
SkyCity hoses down union claims over potential job losses
OPINION: Fair Payment Agreements and 'swallowing vomit' - the lot of the CTU
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares gain; Restaurant Brands climbs on upbeat outlook
NZ dollar stalls after Bascand's rate cut comments
Bascand says RBNZ will consider changing bank capital proposals
Affordable electricity key to decarbonisation - Genesis
Graeme Hart trims global packaging empire with US$615m asset sale

IRG See IRG research reports