Sharechat Logo

Fonterra tweaks website wording after Consumer test of 'light-proof' bottles

Friday 11th August 2017

Text too small?

Fonterra Cooperative Group has amended the claims made about the nutritional benefits of its Anchor-brand 'light-proof' plastic bottles after a Consumer New Zealand test showed they don't protect the vitamins in milk any better than conventional bottles.

Fonterra's Anchor brand website had included the claim that light "can cause damage to vitamin B2 and A" and its light-proof bottle, launched in 2013, could prevent the nutrients from breaking down. But that wording has gone, and the Anchor light-proof bottle is now touted for keeping milk tasting fresh, by preventing the chemical changes when fat and protein in the milk oxidise that produce an "off" flavour. 

Consumer NZ said it tested trim milk because that was most susceptible to degradation. "But the differences in vitamin A and B2 content between the five brands we tested - Anchor, Home Brand, Meadow Fresh, Pams and Signature Range - were minuscule," Consumer said. "For a person eating a balanced diet, these tiny differences would have no significant impact on their overall vitamin intake."

Fonterra's Anchor brand milk and Goodman Fielder's Meadow Fresh were the most expensive of the five tested at 22 cents per 100 mls for a 2-litre opaque bottle. In the test the Anchor trim milk had 0.27 mg of Vitamin B2 and Meadow Fresh had 0.32 mg. The Pams brand, sold at Pak'nSave and New World and Four Square supermarkets at 19 cents/100 mls, also had 0.27 mg as did the Countdown supermarket chain's Signature Range milk, also 19c/100ml.

"When we asked Fonterra for evidence of the nutritional superiority of milk stored in a light-proof bottle, it agreed there wasn't any," Consumer said. "The company has now changed its website to refer to the taste difference of milk in its light-proof bottles instead of the nutritional benefits."

A spokesman for Fonterra said its aim with the light-proof bottle was to ensure consumers "receive their milk in the best condition it can possibly be in, free from light strike and tasting as it did when it was first bottled."

“Most milk, regardless of the brand or manufacturer, contains similar amounts of vitamins A and B2," the spokesman said in a statement. "When light interacts with these vitamins it can break them down into free-radicals - the biggest driver of protein and fat oxidation in milk. When these degrade, that’s when milk starts to taste oxidised. 

“We can’t comment on the methodology behind the Consumer NZ research, but we can categorically say is that our research and that of leading academic bodies, such as Cornell University, shows that milk is damaged by exposure to light," he said. 

(BusinessDesk)



Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.
Bookmark and Share   Printable version
Related News

NZ wool market improves at weekly auction
Spark chases quantum leap in 2019 earnings in latest transformation
Steel & Tube annual profit drops 22% in 'highly competitive' construction sector
CBL says 1H earnings dropped 36% due to increased reserves
UPDATE: Spark annual profit climbs 13% as sales tick up, chairman Verbiest signals exit
IkeGPS raises $3.7 million in placement, plans another $1.3 million raise
August 18th Morning Report
FIRST CUT: Spark annual profit climbs 13% as sales tick up, chairman Verbiest signals exit
NZ dollar dips as rumour of White House departure, Spanish terror attack sap risk appetite
While you were sleeping: Trump unsettles Wall St

IRG See IRG research reports