About Us  |   Advertise  |   Contact Us  |   Terms & Conditions  |   RSS Feeds
 
Support our sponsors:
sharemarket

Supreme Court dashes fraud claims against IRD in Trinity tax case

Friday 9th November 2012

Text too small?

New Zealand's Supreme Court has rejected a claim the Inland Revenue Department fraudulently won its $3.7 billion tax case involving the 'Trinity' forestry scheme.

The court bench, comprising Chief Justice Sian Elias and Justices Andrew Tipping, John McGrath, William Young and Thomas Gault, upheld an appeal by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue, and restored a High Court decision maintaining the tax department's interpretation about tax deductions made by the scheme's investors. The decision was delivered by Justice McGrath in Wellington today.

The tax department has previously said the scheme would have cost taxpayers up to $3.7 billion over the 50-year-lifespan of the investment scheme.

A group of Trinity investors, including the scheme's architect Garry Muir, claimed the IRD "deliberately refrained from putting material facts and law" before the High Court in the original proceeding, "so as to secure a judgment that department officers knew would not have been available if there had been full and frank disclosure of the legal position," the judgment said.

The group, led by Muir's Redcliffe Forestry Venture, said the commissioner "knowingly and wrongly applied a depreciation allowance to expenditure incurred by the Trinity investors" under a certain provision of the Income Tax Act.

The Supreme Court judges rejected the accusation, saying the "Redcliffe cannot credibly claim that the litigation strategy attributed to the commissioner compromised its ability to mount an argument on the subpart's applicability."

Because Redcliffe challenged the legal correctness of a Supreme Court ruling, underpinned by the allegation of fraud, it erred in filing a new proceeding in the High Court, the judgment said.

"What Redcliffe alleges does not constitute a case capable of leading the High Court to set aside the 2004 judgment," it said.

Redcliffe and the other Trinity investors were ordered to pay $15,000 in costs with reasonable disbursements, and reversed a costs order in their favour in the Court of Appeal.

BusinessDesk.co.nz



Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.
Bookmark and Share   Printable version
Related News

Chorus to ask shareholders to lift directors' fee pool 12% to beef up board
Fonterra slashes 2015 milk payout to $5.30/kgMS, earnings tumble 76%
NZ dollar falls to year-low on commodity currency weakness, lower dairy payout
While you were sleeping: Health-care stocks slide
NZ dollar holds near 7-month low as Fonterra results awaited
Beef surges to record on US demand for hamburgers, outlook upbeat
Pyne Gould, EPIC lock horns before vote on sacking directors
Official Assignee to oppose lifting Serepisos's bankruptcy
Kathmandu says Australasian earnings will grow as it steps up global expansion
GeoOp CEO Graham steps down to take US executive role with company, shares drop

 
Previous News
Bond
Bond
News Alerts
Breaking News 
After the Bell (daily) 
Gold News 

Unsubscribe/Update »

RSS feeds »
Twitter »
Facebook »

Most Commented On
  forex centre
cfd centre
options centre
NZX 15 Index
   





© Copyright 2014 MoneyOnline Ltd & Investment Research Group Ltd. All Rights Reserved.