Greenpeace NZ to appeal 2011 ruling against charity status

Monday 3rd September 2012 1 Comment

Text too small?

Greenpeace of New Zealand is appealing a High Court ruling last year that blocked its application to register as a charity that it was too political and its protests could land it on the wrong side of the law.

The environmental lobby group says the appeal is needed after the courts have upheld a series of decisions refusing organisations charitable status and is applying an outdated interpretation of the law. The Court of Appeal in Wellington will hear the application tomorrow.

"At the heart of the challenge is whether Greenpeace's work on nuclear disarmament is too 'political' and whether the amount and type of advocacy it does in support of environmental protection is too much to meet the test for a charity," executive director Bunny McDiarmid said in a statement.

"This appeal raises the question whether New Zealand's charities law will be in line with the Australian law, which allows charities freedom of expression in political debate as long as it is consistent with their charitable purposes," she said.

Justice Paul Heath last year upheld the now-defunct Charities Commission's decision turning down Greenpeace's application, saying its political activities were a core part of the organisation, and that potentially illegal activities such as trespass that were designed to raise public awareness of activities the lobby group opposes disqualified it from meeting the criteria for a charity.

At the time, he said Greenpeace viewed itself more as an "advocate rather than an educator," and cited the commission's examples of Greenpeace's non-violent action including a protest over Fonterra Cooperative Group's increasing use of coal, and a campaign opposing the importation of palm kernel oil that also targeted the dairy exporter.

Greenpeace said its backers are still eligible for tax rebates on donations, and the Greenpeace Educational Trust, which promotes conservation values, protects the natural environment and educates people, is a registered charity.

The lobby group brought in a smaller surplus in calendar 2011 after several large bequests in the prior year helped swell the organisation's coffers.

BusinessDesk.co.nz

Comments from our readers

On 4 September 2012 at 9:36 am Titus said:

This ruling against Greenpeace was motivated purely by a National govt that is intent on silencing freedom of speech in the area of environmental issues. Greenpeace has been making them look bad and they don't like it. When questions are raised of environmental mismanagement by a govt, then political debate is an imperative. The ruling against treating Greenpeace as a charity only shows National for what they really are; unconcerned about climate change and all for making it easy for big business to be less efficient in reducing carbon emissions. Their latest attempts to water down the ETS further perfectly illustrates their contempt for climate change and NZs commitment to reducing CO2.

Add your comment:

Your name:
Your email:	Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.