Sharechat Logo

Compromise reached on Auckland port extension

Thursday 30th April 2015

Text too small?

Ports of Auckland has offered to only extend one of the two wharves it wants to push further out into Auckland harbour in a backdown that it hopes will take the heat out of local opposition to its plans.

After weeks of heated political argument, Auckland Council's governing body supported a compromise put up by the port company to proceed with one of two 100 metre wharf extensions and put the other on hold.

The port company has resource consents allowing it to sink piles into the sea floor to extend two wharves to a length that would allow them to accommodate cruise ships and has long-term plans to infill the area between the two pile extensions.  However, it has no resource consents for the infill work and faces growing public backlash over such plans through the efforts of groups such as 'Stop Stealing Our Harbour', which mobilised to have the pile extension consents overturned.

“The proposal is a compromise,” said Ports of Auckland chief executive Tony Gibson. "It’s not our preferred outcome because of the impact on the cruise industry, however it is a pragmatic, workable solution to the current problem. It allows the port to continue to handle Auckland’s growing freight needs in the short term, while the long-term future of the port is debated.”

Under the proposal, Ports of Auckland will continue building the eastern extension but put on hold construction of the western extension until after the Port Future Study is completed.

"This proposal addresses a number of community concerns, especially around sight lines from Queens Wharf, while providing sufficient berth space for current freight needs and growth in the immediate future," said Gibson.

 

 

 

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

EBOS announces appointment of new Chief Financial Officer
AM Best affirms Tower Limited's A- (Excellent) FSR
MCK enters into conditional agreement for Whangarei land
April 26th Morning Report
SPG - Change to Executive Team
BGI - Forgiveness of $200,000 of secured indebtedness
General Capital Subsidiary General Finance Market Update
AFT,Massey Ventures,Gilles McIndoe to develop scar treatmen
April 24th Morning Report
Cheers to many fewer grape harvest spills