Sharechat Logo

Penny and Hooper to appeal tax avoidance rulings

Monday 2nd August 2010

Text too small?

Two Christchurch surgeons who lost appeals against tax avoidance findings are taking their case to the Supreme Court.

The nation's highest court granted the orthopaedic specialists, Ian Penny and Gary Hooper, granted leave to appeal today against the Court of Appeal's split decision, delivered on June 4, that found the way they restructured their earnings through family trusts at the time of income tax rate increases in 2000 constituted avoidance.

The landmark case divided opinion amongst tax practitioners, some of whom believed the decision struck at arrangements commonly made by the self-employed, while others believed it was unlikely to have significant impacts except for flagrant examples of income restructuring involving companies with a sole employee.

However, the case is widely seen as fundamental to creating greater certainty about how to apply general anti-tax avoidance law at a time when the tax authorities have had a number of precedent-setting wins.

The Court of Appeal decision marked a clean sweep for the Inland Revenue Department in a series of cases, including the pre-Christmas settlement by foreign-owned banks of avoidance arrangements that netted additional revenue for the taxpayer of $2.2 billion.

At the heart of the surgeons' cases was action taken to cut their salaries from more than $650,000 and $300,000 a year to around $120,000 after the top personal tax rate rose to 39% on April 1, 2000.

Their families continued to derive substantial income above those figures through dividend distributions to family trusts from the companies established to employ both men.  Both Penny and Hooper agreed in court that their new salaries were not commercially realistic.

Businesswire.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

SML - Synlait Milk Limited - Trading Halt of Securities
AIA - Auckland Airport announces board chair changes
AIA - Auckland Airport announces board chair changes
CEN - Tauhara commissioning progress update
FPH initiates voluntary limited recall
March 28th Morning Report
KFL Celebrates 20 Years of Excellence in Investment Mgmt.
SVR - Savor FY24 Earnings Guidance & Change in Banking Partner
NZK - NZ King Salmon Investments Limited FY24 Results
March 27th Morning Report