Sharechat Logo

Commerce Commission faces slippery questions in X-rated inquiry

Wednesday 11th June 2014 1 Comment

Text too small?

Consenting adults they may be at the Commerce Commission, since they give consent to merger and acquisition proposals as long as they don't harm competition.

But rarely has this normally straight-laced organ of state been asked to handle as slippery a problem as the proposed acquisition of Johnson & Johnson's KY jelly brand of personal lubricant by Reckitt Benckiser, owners of the Durex range of adult lubricants.

Such is the greasy pole of competitive retailing, however, it seems the commission will need to consider dominance issues that could arise if the makers of the Durex range, described as being "positioned at the playful or adventurous end of the spectrum", were also to own the KY range, which Reckitt says is positioned at the "basic reassurance or medical end of the spectrum."

"Reckitt Benckiser states that personal lubricant products are differentiated by reference to a range of factors, including base ingredient (e.g., water or silicone based), functional attributes, end-use, flavour and target customer base," says the commission statement of preliminary issues.  "While most suppliers of personal lubricants produce a range of differentiated lubricant products, Reckitt Benckiser submits that there is substitutability along the spectrum such that they fall within a single New Zealand market for the supply of personal lubricants."

And while supermarkets only stock three lubricant brands, the two under consideration and Ansell, "pharmacies, adult retailers and online shops stock a wider range of personal lubricant brands" and that sex shop and online sales are growing, with customers able to swap smoothly between various options.

"Reckitt Benckiser submits that, post-acquisition, many strong and effective existing competitors would remain and could easily expand," the summary says.

Tragically for the commission and hilariously for juvenile news reports of this potential source of competitive friction, the four page statement of preliminary issues also proposes to "assess the horizontal effects that might arise as a result of this acquisition."

A decision is expected by July 17.

 

 

 

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

On 11 June 2014 at 5:57 pm Don said:
Comcom is sliding down a slippery slope taking on such heady stuff. We wish them luck with their deliberations.
Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Govt opts for sweeping review of 'underperforming' RMA
AFT gains Australian registration for intravenous Maxigesic
24th July 2019 Morning Report
Should Fletcher Building persist with Australia?
NZD weaker as greenback gains on news US-China trade talks to recommence
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares extend gain as Mainfreight, A2 hit new highs
StretchSense directors appoint administrators
NZ dollar falls on news RBNZ is looking at "unconventional" policy
Wrightson capital return gets shareholder approval
Morrison & Co eyes asset sales from first PIP Fund

IRG See IRG research reports