By Phil Boeyen, ShareChat Business News Editor
Wednesday 21st March 2001
|Text too small?|
In the Carter Holt decision the Commerce Commission says although the purchase of the Tasman Mill would give the company a large market share, it would not equate to market dominance.
"Pulp products are traded internationally in large quantities. In general terms, the factors preventing dominance in New Zealand markets are the ability of CHH customers to import products, the ability of CHH suppliers to export products and, in some markets, the countervailing power of customers or suppliers."
In the case of Fletcher Steel the Commission says it had cleared a previous application in 1999 but the acquisition did not go ahead and the clearance had expired.
The Commission's John Belgrave says much of the information in the previous decision was applicable to the present application.
"The Commission analysed competition in those markets and found some changes had occurred including some of the smaller competitors expanding their operations, but found that these changes would not alter its previous decision to give a clearance" he says.
No comments yet
Fletcher Building faces probe into plasterboard supply deals
Fletcher closes Christchurch plasterboard plant after finding asbestos
Fletcher Building names Charles Bolt as general counsel, replacing Farrell
Fletcher beats estimates with $326M FY profit as NZ revives, Australia stays flat
Fletcher executive Worley leaves as underperforming Crane unit brought in-house
Fletcher puts strategy under microscope seeking $70M annual gain, will shed jobs
Fletcher Building 1H profit edges up
Fletcher Building capital notes rollover at 5.4 percent from 8.9 percent
Fletcher Building offloads CSP Coating galvanised steel unit
Fletcher not abusing its role running Canterbury home repairs, EQC says