Sharechat Logo

Dave Henderson's tax conviction appeal tossed out

Monday 10th October 2016

Text too small?

The Court of Appeal has dismissed Christchurch property developer David Henderson's bid to throw out tax convictions over claimed judicial bias. 

Justices Stephen Kos, Jill Mallon and Christian Whata rejected Henderson's claim, saying Christchurch district court judge Gary MacAskill's comments "are isolated and in context do not create an impression of real unfairness or unwavering prejudgment" and that someone watching the whole trial and reading the judge's minutes wouldn't reasonably think the judge wasn't impartial. 

"Viewed overall in the context of a difficult trial the narrative perceived by an observer would be the judge was concerned with fairness to Mr Henderson, particularly in light of the misconceived defence originally relied on by the latter, adjourned trial on not one but (quite extraordinarily) two occasions to let him revise his submissions to respond to the substance of the prosecution allegations, and would have honestly reflected on the evidence presented at the final phase of trial when deliberating and preparing his reasons for the verdicts," the judgment said. "At the same time, the judge tested the respective cases advanced robustly, albeit in a manner which an inadequately informed observer might have thought conclusory."

Henderson was found guilty on seven charges of being a party to his company, Dweller, not paying PAYE tax which had been deducted from employees but wasn't sent to the Inland Revenue Department. The offending took place in 2010. The trial took 10 months due to several breaks in proceedings, with Henderson initially representing himself in November 2014 before he hired legal representation in May 2015.

The property developer agreed to pay back about $143,000 from a family trust, and the judge sentenced him to 200 hours of community work and four months of community detention. 

The appeal court examined the three stages of Henderson's trial and found no bias in any of them, with the judge granting the property developer the "indulgence" of re-opening his defence after choosing not to cross-examine prosecution witnesses in pursuing a technical defence. 

Judge MacAskill earned a rebuke for using "unfortunate" expressions in a minute that "is not to be encouraged", although the appeal bench said it understandable and simply an expression of preliminary views. 

"The judge's subsequent conduct in allowing an adjournment for the sake of fairness indicates his continued open-mindedness," the judgment said.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Auckland Airport kicks off next phase of expansion
Cashed-up Plexure eyes acquisitions to accelerate growth as loss shrinks
Tower turns to 1H profit, lifts FY guidance
IRD should have doubled claim against Watson's Cullen Group - Professor
Investore FY profit falls 16% on smaller valuation gain, signals flat dividend for 2020
Synlait receives cease and desist letter regarding Pokeno plant
21st May 2019 Morning Report
NZ dollar steady ahead of central bank speeches
Auditors need to come out of the shadows and explain the value they add: FMA
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares gain as Liberal win in Australia boosts bank stocks

IRG See IRG research reports