Sharechat Logo

SFO lays 50 fraud charges against Allan Hubbard

Monday 20th June 2011 2 Comments

Text too small?

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) today announced that it has made a decision in relation to its investigation into the affairs of Aorangi Securities Ltd (ASL); Hubbard Management Funds (HMF); and ASL directors Allan and Margaret (Jean) Hubbard.

SFO Chief Executive, Adam Feeley, said, “After an exhaustive investigation, we have concluded that there is sufficient evidence to lay fraud charges against Mr Hubbard.”

Feeley said that fifty charges under sections 220, 242 and 260 of the Crimes Act had been laid today in the District Court in Timaru.

The SFO said it did not intend to lay charges against any other current or former director of ASL. Nor were any other charges being contemplated by the other agencies involved with the investigations into ASL or HMF.

Feeley said that the investigation had relied on assistance from the Securities Commission (and now the FMA) and the Registrar of Companies.

“We need to acknowledge the contribution from others to what has been a very thorough and professional investigation.”

Financial Markets Authority (FMA), Chief Executive Sean Hughes, said the FMA and the SFO have worked together closely throughout this investigation, and the evidence on which the charges laid by the SFO are based could also give rise to charges by the FMA under section 59 of the Securities Act.

However after careful consideration, both organisations are satisfied that the charges laid by the SFO will address this matter in a way that is proportionate, and that this matter is more appropriately prosecuted by the SFO under the Crimes Act, without expenditure of additional public funds on a separate prosecution by the FMA.

“The FMA has therefore closed its investigation into this matter, and has offered the SFO any ongoing assistance which may be required,” Hughes said.

Feeley said that there were aspects of the case which challenged the conventional concepts of serious fraud.

“Whatever the public may think, in considering whether serious fraud has been committed, the motives or lifestyle of an alleged offender are ultimately irrelevant. We have to consider matters such as whether deceit has occurred; the losses caused by that that deceit; and whether the facts meet the prescribed elements of one or more criminal offences.”

Feeley said that prior to making a decision to lay charges the SFO gave very careful consideration to the Solicitor General’s Prosecution Guidelines, including the issue of whether a prosecution was in the public interest.

“The decision to charge has been reached only after extensive analysis of the evidence, as well as discussions with senior prosecution counsel, including the Crown Solicitors and the SFO Panel Counsel,” he said.

“Throughout the investigation we have been aware of the level of public interest in, and support for, Hubbard, and the issues of Mr Hubbard’s age and health which have been raised by his lawyers.”

“However, we also have to consider the interests of justice and the interests of the investors relative to the evidence we have obtained during our inquiries.”

“We are satisfied that, on balance, there is strong public interest in having this matter put before the Court, and any issues regarding fitness to stand trial will be matters for the Court to adjudicate on.”

- SFO press release

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

On 21 June 2011 at 10:34 am Mark said:
Regardless of the words used, the simple fact remains that the SFO has been spectacularly ineffective against the professional fraudsters. A king hit on an old man does nothing to restore faith in the SFO or the system.
On 21 June 2011 at 11:20 am Alberre Tross said:
If Mr Hubbard's lawyers are worried about his age then they shouldn't prolong the inevitable. With SCF yet to come, the Hubbards could be spending the rest of their time in Court.
Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Geneva Finance Limited (NZX: GFL) Half Year Results
The New Zealand Refining Company Limited (NZX: NZR) NZ announces equity raising
Asset Plus Limited (NZX: APL) Result for the six months ended 30 September 2021
Me Today Limited (NZX: MEE) 30 September 21 Results and Conditional Placement
Oceania Healthcare Limited (NZX: OCA) Delivers Improved Performance Despite COVID-19
29th November 2021 Morning Report
Radius Residential Care Limited (NZX: RAD) Announces Half Year Results of FY22
NZ Automotive Investments Limited (NZX: NZA) Interim Results for Half Year 2022
Greenfern Industries Limited (NZX: GFI) Releases Interim Results
Hallenstein Glasson Holdings Limited (NZX: HLG) Announcement of Final Dividend