By Chris Hutching
Monday 16th September 2002 |
Text too small? |
The five-year spat driven by disgruntled Richmond shareholders fearful of their fate under the southern cooperative's raids on the share register culminated in a two-week hearing recently in the High Court at Christchurch, fought by four Queen's counsel and their retinues.
Justice Young found in favour of the Richmond parties in two of five counts, that HKM Associates was an undisclosed nominee company for PPCS when it bought a 34% stake of Richmond shares from the Meat Board in 1998, and that PPCS failed to disclose its interest in a small parcel of 290,000 shares in several notices lodged by PPCS between February 1999 and July 2000. The other counts alleging "warehousing" of Richmond shares by PPCS were withdrawn by the Richmond parties as the case proceeded.
Justice Young now faces the difficult task of deciding an appropriate penalty and the commercial effect it might have.
One of the PPCS lawyers has raised arguments that PPCS is already paying $20 million more than it might have in securing the Richmond shares because it was forced to sell them in 1999 when the Richmond the board ruled the PPCS-HKM deal breached the company's constitution.
Another company, Active Equities, then bought the 34% stake and PPCS has a deal to repurchase them but has to pay $20 million above the earlier price.
PPCS has a put option with Active Equities that will give it 51% of Richmond in February 2003.
In his recent judgment Justice Young outlined the series of deceits played by executives and legal advisers on both sides in their attempts to outmanoever each other.
No comments yet
General Capital Appoints New CFO
SUM - Summerset Considers Retail Bond Offer
SKC - Updated FY25 Full Year Earnings Guidance
Chorus considers Capital Notes offer
May 5th Morning Report
KPG - Kiwi Property announces GM Corporate Services
Mainfreight Limited - Trading Conditions Update 2 May 2025
SIML - Change to Executive Team
BAI - Divestment of education group
May 2nd Morning Report