Sharechat Logo

Huljich faces criminal charges

Thursday 18th November 2010 3 Comments

Text too small?

The Securities Commission has confirmed it has laid criminal charges against Huljich Wealth Management director Peter Huljich.

The charges relate to the Huljich KiwiSaver Scheme promoted by Huljich Wealth Management and Peter Huljich.

The Commission alleges Peter Huljich and Huljich Wealth Management misled prospective investors by misrepresenting the investment performance of the scheme's funds in offer documents.

The documents contained graphs comparing the Huljich KiwiSaver Funds' investment performance to other competitor KiwiSaver funds but failed to disclose that the Huljich figures included related party payments made at the direction of Peter Huljich.

Those payments made a significant impact on the Huljich KiwiSaver Funds' investment performance figures.

The Commission also alleges Peter Huljich made untrue statements in the scheme's registered prospectuses which included summary financial performance information but failed to disclose the related party payments.

Criminal charges have been laid summarily  under section 58(3) of the Securities Act 1978 which carries a maximum penalty of three months imprisonment or a $300,000 fine and under section 59(1)(c) of the Securities Act 1978 which carries a maximum penalty of a fine of $300,000.

The first call of the charges will be in the Auckland District Court on January 14 2011.

 



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

On 18 November 2010 at 3:09 pm Grumpy said:
I see John Banks has responded with "No investor had lost any money in relation to these allegations". So that makes it alright then John? Huljich has certainly made money because of it though.
On 18 November 2010 at 8:40 pm At grumpy said:
Actually I think Mr Banks is trying to say these actions are not comparable to other current financial firms thar are under investigation. In fact Huljich investors have benefited from the payments. Work it over "Grumpy".
On 1 December 2010 at 10:27 am Agreed said:
Huljich mislead investors by manipulating its reports to make their returns look more favourable - which may have led to more investors choosing to sign with Huljich or sign over to Huljich, resulting in Huljich generating more money than otherwise , i aggree with Grumpy
Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

VCT - Operational performance for the year ended 30 June 2024
Challenge to banks the way to go
Bigger returns or lower risk?
NPH - Director Appointment
July 19th Morning Report
Wellington International Airport Ltd (“WIA040”) - Maturity
Devon Funds Morning Note - 18 July 2024
CNU - Commerce Commission releases draft Price Quality decision
Precinct FY24 Annual Results and Webcast Details
Scott Technology appoints new CEO