Forum Archive Index - June 2004

[Robin Benson <rob@hammerheadmedia.co.uk>]

On 30 May 2004, at 19:19, Lazy Haggis wrote:

> Your conclusions are very easy to dispute, but I think it's more 
> appropriate that you provide further brief comment initially on the 
> following.
>
> 1) Using your particular form of technical analysis for PNA, what 
> chart conclusions (uptrend or downtrend) would you draw over the 
> following time periods: 6 minutes, 6 hours, 6 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, 
> 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years?
>
> 2) Do all your chart analyses (uptrend or downtrend) for the above 
> periods agree with each other, and if not, why not?
>
> 3) If your conclusions (uptrend or downtrend) differ, which one is 
> correct and why?
>
> 4) Why did you choose a 6 month period to draw your conclusions?
>
> Lazy Haggis
> The Mumbo Jumbo Filter

http://www.iep.utm.edu/f/fallacies.htm

Robin


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/