Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - November 2003

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] Gold chart


From: Phaedrus <Phaedrus@techemail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:18:55 -0800 (PST)


>From a technical perspective, the gold situation is very clear.

 Since the lows of early 1991, gold has been in a steady uptrend, consistently 
making higher highs and higher lows. The rate of this uptrend has been 
increasing - the price accelerated away from tentative trendlines before they 
were confirmed as trendlines became steeper. The lastest trendline, though, has 
been repeatedly confirmed, and a break of this would provide a clear exit 
signal for those wanting to lock in profits.

 The break of the confirmed long-term downward trendline in February 2002 gave 
long-term investors a good entry point.
 
 Trading the medium-term trendline breaks continues to be very successful - 
buy/sell points are marked with arrows. More active traders would find Relative 
Momentum Index signals to be even more profitable, though their use 
necessitates a higher level of activity.

                  Phaedrus.
 

 

_____________________________________________________________
Are you a Techie? Get Your Free Tech Email Address Now! Visit 
http://www.TechEmail.com

GIF image

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] how much will I win?. by macdunk Duncan MacGregor
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] Past 12 Months - Percentage Facts Soarer2 ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: RE: [sharechat] Gold chart Allan Potts
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] how much will I win?. by macdunk Duncan MacGregor ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]