Forum Archive Index - June 2003
Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.
Re: [sharechat] The Rational Investor ?
Hi Dean,
>
> Anyway are investors rational or not. I'll present the facts and
> leave you to decide...
>
> Richina Pacific recently conduted a 1for1 rights issue to raise
> US$10.4 million, current investors in the company could elect to pay
> for their entitlement in US$ or NZ$ and the rates were set by the
> company so that you could pay either US$0.145 or NZ$0.28 per share.
>
>if you subscibed for your rights in NZ$ you
> paid 28 cents NZ per share, but if you paid for your rights in US$
> you only paid 25 cents NZ (US$0.145 x 1/0.58). This meant that if you
> paid in $NZ you paid a 12% premium for your shares as opposed to if
> you paid for them in US$,
>
>9% of subscibers by paying for their shares in
> NZ$ burnt approximately $200,000 of their own money for no good reason
> other than the fact that they did not think through the transaction
> logically or couldn't be bothered with the hassle and cost of a bank
> draft! I guess that if all of them were tiny shareholders then the
> cost benefit analysis of this may have been logical but I doubt it.
>
>
Why doubt it? 9% of shares owned by shareholders holding a parcel of
shares so small that it was not economic to get a bank draft sounds
about right to me. Given that such a transaction might require at least
two visits to a bank branch, and that there are some towns that don't
even have banks that deal in overseas funds, why berate people for
taking the logical option and sending in an $NZ cheque?
>
>
> This raises some interesting points -
>
> Are investors really rational?
>
No. Whatever gave you the idea that they were?
>
> Was the company at fault by not advising its owners to pay in NZ$? (In
> effect this resulted in a transfer payment from the unwary (the
> investor) to the wary (the company).
>
No.
>
>If this type of transaction is
> typical then it leaves us some hope that markets are not truly
> efficient and that an investor that does his homework has a
> reasonable prospect of making a buck.
>
>
Really Dean, people like Buffett have been investing on the principle
that markets are not efficient for decades. You are a bit behind the
times ol' son.
But also investing does not rely on you outguessing the other guy to win.
Investment is not a zero sum game, so it is possible for every investor to
be a winner.
Of course, share trading is much closer to a zero sum game, which
means the average pure share investor will always outperform the
average pure share trader.
SNOOPY
--
Message sent by Snoopy
on Pegasus Mail version 4.02
----------------------------------
"Dogs have big tongues, so you can bet they don't
bite them by accident"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|
|
Sharemarket News By Email
At a Glance
| NZX 50 Index |
3225.14 |
 |
1.70 |
| S&P/ASX 200 |
4818.10 |
 |
3.90 |
| Dow Jones Industrials |
10611.80 |
 |
44.50 |
Stock Quote
Comment & Analysis
|
“
Things are moving so fast in the markets and global economies that most writers I follow are complaining of the same thing – there is so much of value being written that it is near impossible to keep up. When top writers such as John Mauldin and George Friedman complain of the volume of [...]
”
Wayne Lochore More »
|
|
|