Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - January 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] WORKING AT THE COAL FACE- Investment results (2)


From: "G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 23:09:27 +1300


 
Please refer to my post of Jan. 3
 
1.The investments were made on 3 different dates. To facilitate future comparisons, I have calculated a weighted mean date which is Nov. 30, 2000.
 
All investments are deemed to have been made on that day and Nov.30, 2001 will be the last day of a year's investment.  
 
2.Latest result.
Based on current market prices ( $NZ ), the value of the stocks has increased by 11.5 % since Nov. 30 ( 7 weeks ).
 
To express the final Australian currencies in $ NZ, the wholesale rate of 0.8036 was used. No allowances were made for brokerage and stamp duty.
 
My result of Jan 3 mentioned that ideally a heavy weighting for LACO should have been used. However, I just invested in 1 share / option of each stock.
 
3. Discussion.
Since the result of Jan 3 was issued, the price of LACO rose from $A 3.60 to $A 4.15: < www.lang.com.au >
CLH rose 10 % to $A 3.13 and this stock with its advanced I T is popular amongst the Australian investors.
Its balance date is June 30. Expect a high P/E and low div. yield from this high quality stock!!  < www.collectionhouse.com.au >
 
The NZ stocks eg. AIA, SKC and BCH are starting to make a positive move at last! 
  
5. The next result will be in a detailed format.
 
Gerry 
     

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] EBOS Nigel McCarter
Previous by Date: Re: Re: [sharechat] BTBC Update Mike Hudson ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] NZSE Hours tomorrow Philip Robinson
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] WORK. AT THE COAL FACE- Investment results (2) G Stolwyk ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]