Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - June 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] Interesting telco article


From: "Geoff Ewert" <gewert@wai.quik.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:36:11 +1200


Imagine if we get some comp. in line rentals,the backbone of the co(denied
of course) Rehash of "Shaft" at the local theatres directed by Rod and Peter
Regards G
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Dutton" <bendutton@sharechat.co.nz>
To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 12:01 PM
Subject: [sharechat] Interesting telco article


> An interesting article from Forbes on the inevitable demise of the U.S.
> long-distance calling industry.
>
> Same concept could be applied to New Zealand as well.
>
> "Sooner than you think, long-distance calls will be free. Kiss billions in
> annual profits good-bye..."
>
> http://www.forbes.com/forbes/00/0703/6515070a.htm
>
> Happy reading.
>
> Benjamin Dutton
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market
investors
> To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] Interesting telco article Steve Moxham
Previous by Date: [sharechat] RMG/FRO opening price simon dallimore ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Interesting telco article Steve Moxham
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] Interesting telco article Ben Dutton ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]