Sharechat Logo

GPG leads in forests battle

By Nick Stride

Friday 16th August 2002

Text too small?
All eyes are on Sir Ronald Brierley's Guinness Peat Group following the defeat of Fletcher Forests' plan to buy the Central North Island Forests.

Fletcher Forests shareholders narrowly voted down the $1.3 billion deal on Tuesday and the finger-pointing started almost immediately.

"GPG's entry was another complication to the CNI deal, which shareholders didn't know how to read," Fletcher chairman Sir Dryden Spring told Dow Jones Newswires.

"They (GPG) introduced a concept called consolidation which implied they had some better plan, which I don't think they have." GPG has kept its intentions to itself, saying only that it sees the CNI forests being part of a "broad consolidation" of the New Zealand forestry industry.

The deal's defeat means potential buyers will once again be taking their proposals to receiver Michael Stiassny, who told the Dominion Post he had "some contingency plans" and was moving them forward quickly.

Sir Dryden rejected calls for Fletcher's board to "fall on their swords", saying the 70% shareholder vote in support of the deal indicated directors still had a mandate. There has been speculation GPG will now seek board control of Rubicon and even Fletcher but the raider has only a 19.9% stake in Rubicon, which in turn has 17.7% of Fletcher. Sir Dryden conceded the 37c a share exit price for Rubicon was the decisive factor in the deal's defeat.

The price attracted vociferous opposition from the deal's opponents, who claimed Fletcher's remaining shareholders would be impoverished by Rubicon's "preferential treatment."

Fletcher has pointed out many times that the banks for whom Mr Stiassny is acting are getting their interest, penalty interest, and the forests' excess cashflows.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

VHP - Managed Investment Scheme 2026 Annual Report
PYS - Annual Meeting and Director Nominations
SCT - Scott Expects Record FY26 as 2030 Strategy Gains Momentum
PGW - Positive PGW Results in Improving Markets
TEM - Board appointment
VGL - Vista congratulates James Miller on FMA Chair appointment
RYM - Director resignation and committee chair appointment
MFB - Chair Succession
CNU - Update on constitutional ownership restrictions
CEN - Contact, CDC partner to explore data centre development